Skip to content

GRA · Asset Management Nexus

Spatial financeWhere capital meets hazard, exposure and transition

Scenario analysis for portfolios

Scenario design and stress testing explore how portfolios and funds would fare under severe but plausible conditions: disorderly transitions, physical climate shocks, market-wide redemptions or sudden rate rises. They complement statistical risk measures where history offers little guide, and their value lies in transparent assumptions rather than in any single result.

01Qeyd

Scenario analysis for portfolios on the record.

Method recordSTEM method
  1. RêbazSêwirandina senaryoyan û ceribandina bin zextê
  2. Applied inAsset Management Nexus
  3. Canonical pageSTEM Commons
02Serlêdan

What scenario design and stress testing does here.

Scenario design and stress testing construct plausible, severe future conditions to examine how pergalan and institutions would perform. They complement probabilistic analysis where data are scarce or futures are deeply uncertain. In capital markets and investment, climate and hazards and biodiversity and nature, stress tests reveal vulnerabilities that arise when several risks materialise together. They inform capital, contingency and coordination plans across sectors. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.

Climate scenario analysis of portfolios

NGFS pathways are translated into sector and company shocks to earnings, asset values and credit spreads, then applied to holdings, with each translation step and its assumptions recorded.

System-wide redemption and margin scenarios

Fund outflows, collateral calls and dealer capacity are combined in one scenario so that second-round sales across funds with common holdings can be traced.

Reverse stress testing

The analysis starts from an outcome a board cannot accept, such as suspended dealing or a funding shortfall, and works back to the combinations of conditions that would cause it.

03Çavdêrî bike

Scenario stress.

The screen a team would use to follow this method: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Scenario stress

Asset management · Scenario analysis for portfolios · Run R-5442

Severe case breaches limitGRA · Asset Management Nexus

Scenario set

Xeta bingehînCentral26Di nav de
Adverse1-in-2560Girtin
Tund1-in-10087Breach
Reverse stressFind the break100Defines edge

Method card

Rêbaz
Sêwirandina senaryoyan û ceribandina bin zextê
Vegotin
compound shock
Horizon
2 years
Nîşan
MODELKIRÎ

Impact build-up, severe case

Scenario stress: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Asset management.Nav û nirxên nimûneyî; sêwiran e, ne qeyd an pergaleke zindî ye.
04Dane

What the method consumes.

Datasets and records used by scenario design and stress testing on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.

DaneRolNîşan
NGFS climate scenariosMacro and sector pathwaysMODELKIRÎ
Supervisory stress scenario frameworksSeverity and design referenceStatîstîkên weşandî
Historical stress episodesAnalogues and calibrationÇAVDÊRÎKIRÎ
Portfolio and liability dataExposure to the shocksREPORTED
05Scenario model

Transition and physical risk on a portfolio.

Three scenario families after the NGFS framework move a sector portfolio through carbon costs and warming damages; the transmission view follows the losses to lenders, investors, public finances and households. Scenario: named assumptions about the future, not a forecast.

Kontrol

Carbon price at the horizon, orderly path
200 per tCO2
Delay before a disorderly transition
50% of horizon
Cost passed to customers
50%
Warming today above pre-industrial
1.30°C
Warming per decade, current policies
0.25°C
Damage coefficient
0.24% per °C²
Salên pêş
25 years

Xwendin

Worst scenario at the horizon
−33.6% of value
Jimar, rêbaz û çavkanî
SalOrderly transition (% value)Delayed, disorderly transition (% value)Current policies (% value)
0−0.38−0.38−0.38
3−2.87−0.53−0.67
6−5.36−0.68−0.97
9−7.84−0.84−1.27
12−10.33−0.99−1.57
15−12.82−7.12−1.87
18−15.31−15.05−2.17
21−17.80−23.00−2.48
24−20.29−30.94−2.79

Rêbaz

  1. Climate scenario families NGFS (2023), Climate Scenarios for central banks and supervisors, Phase IV
  2. Climate stress test of the financial system Battiston and others (2017), Nature Climate Change 7
  3. Damage function Nordhaus (2017), Revisiting the social cost of carbon, PNAS 114
  4. Transmission channels BCBS (2021), Climate-related risk drivers and their transmission channels
  5. Pankeya nediyarîyê (Monte Carlo ya parametreyan) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  6. Hesasiyeta yek-yek (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Dane

The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page’s map can draw:

  • Dirêjahiyên bajarî Natural Earth
  • Benderên behrê Natural Earth
  • Past year, daily temperature (ERA5 via Open-Meteo) Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), Copernicus ERA5 (C3S/ECMWF) · register open-meteo.public-pages
  • Surface air temperature, daytime (AIRS) NASA AIRS · register nasa.gibs.context-live-layers
Transition and physical risk on a portfolio. Illustrative teaching model: it runs on the values set by the controls, not on measured data. Methods: Climate scenario families (NGFS (2023), Climate Scenarios for central banks and supervisors, Phase IV); Climate stress test of the financial system (Battiston and others (2017), Nature Climate Change 7); Damage function (Nordhaus (2017), Revisiting the social cost of carbon, PNAS 114).

Li seranserê şeş stûnan, bi pêşengiya Nexus Consortium

06Erêkirin

How results are checked.

Scenarios are reviewed for plausibility, internal consistency and severity relative to history. Exercise outcomes are compared with actual events when they occur.

Kontrol bikinHow it is done
Plausibility and severity reviewScenarios are compared with historical episodes and with supervisory severity levels
Internal consistencyShocked variables are checked against each other so no scenario combines incompatible paths
Assumption registerEvery behavioural and pricing assumption is listed with its source and the sensitivity of the result to it

Scenario choice can reflect prevailing assumptions and miss novel combinations. Results depend on how participants and models represent responses.

07Exposure, loss and capital

What scenario analysis for portfolios means for exposure, loss and capital.

The exposure, loss, scenario and capital views a risk officer, supervisor or ministry of finance would ask for, with the frameworks they report against. Structures follow supervisory and actuarial practice. Values are illustrative: never prices, ratings or advice.

Scenario pathways

How scenario analysis for portfolios could be stressed under the scenario families central banks and supervisors use.

OrderlyDisorderlyHot house world202520302035204020452050bilindkêm
Scenario familyTransition riskPhysical riskWhat a stress test asks
OrderlyEarly, gradual policyKêmtirCan the book absorb a steady repricing?
DisorderlyLate, abrupt policyLower to mediumWhat breaks under a sudden repricing and credit migration?
Hot house worldLimited policyHigh and risingWhere do physical losses concentrate in collateral and insurance?
Scenario families as defined by the NGFS; the curves are an illustrative combined pressure index, not NGFS variables or forecasts.
NGFS climate scenarios · Network for Greening the Financial SystemIFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures · ISSBTCFD recommendations · Financial Stability Board TCFDPrinciples for the effective management of climate-related financial risks · Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
09Stewardship

Who maintains the method.

Rêveberiya xetera pergalî stewards scenario design and stress testing for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

11Pirs

Pirs û bersiv.

What are the limits of scenario design and stress testing in this field?
Scenario choice can reflect prevailing assumptions and miss novel combinations. Results depend on how participants and models represent responses.
How are results checked?
Scenarios are reviewed for plausibility, internal consistency and severity relative to history. Exercise outcomes are compared with actual events when they occur.
Are the values on this page real?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method’s use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Where else is this method applied?
Çavdêrxaneya canonical method page lists every platform that applies it.
rêzeya Pergalên StratejîkTevkarî bike

Ji vê rûpelê delîl bidin.

rêzeya Pergalên Stratejîk is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks AllianceAsset Management NexusAmadebûna fînans û sîgortayêSenaryo û ceribandina stresê
Asset Management Nexus

Bring an exposure or capital question to the Alliance.

Agahî û pirs îro vekirî ne. Pirsek referansekê distîne û gava piştî wê dide nasîn; serlêdan, drav, veqetandina hesabkirinê û tomarkirin tenê dema ku tîm, mercên wê û kapasîteya vekolînê hebin vedibin.