Skip to content

GRA · Asset Management Nexus

Keuangan spasialTempat modal bertemu bahaya, keterpaparan, dan transisi

Scenario analysis for portfolios

Scenario design and stress testing explore how portfolios and funds would fare under severe but plausible conditions: disorderly transitions, physical climate shocks, market-wide redemptions or sudden rate rises. They complement statistical risk measures where history offers little guide, and their value lies in transparent assumptions rather than in any single result.

01Daftar

Scenario analysis for portfolios on the record.

Catatan metodeMetode STEM
  1. MetodePerancangan skenario dan uji tekanan
  2. Diterapkan diAsset Management Nexus
  3. Halaman kanonisSTEM Commons
02Permohonan

What scenario design and stress testing does here.

Scenario design and stress testing construct plausible, severe future conditions to examine how Sistem and institutions would perform. They complement probabilistic analysis where data are scarce or futures are deeply uncertain. In capital markets and investment, climate and hazards and biodiversity and nature, stress tests reveal vulnerabilities that arise when several risks materialise together. They inform capital, contingency and coordination plans across sectors. The canonical description is on STEM Commons.

Climate scenario analysis of portfolios

NGFS pathways are translated into sector and company shocks to earnings, asset values and credit spreads, then applied to holdings, with each translation step and its assumptions recorded.

System-wide redemption and margin scenarios

Fund outflows, collateral calls and dealer capacity are combined in one scenario so that second-round sales across funds with common holdings can be traced.

Reverse stress testing

The analysis starts from an outcome a board cannot accept, such as suspended dealing or a funding shortfall, and works back to the combinations of conditions that would cause it.

03Pantau

Scenario stress.

Layar yang akan digunakan sebuah tim untuk mengikuti metode ini: ukuran, status, dan keputusannya. Nama adalah contoh dan nilai bersifat ilustratif.

Scenario stress

Asset management · Scenario analysis for portfolios · Run R-5442

Severe case breaches limitGRA · Asset Management Nexus

Perangkat skenario

Garis dasarCentral26Dalam batas
Adverse1-in-2560Tutup
Parah1-in-10087Pelanggaran
Reverse stressFind the break100Defines edge

Kartu metode

Metode
Perancangan skenario dan uji tekanan
Narasi
compound shock
Cakrawala
2 tahun
Label
DIMODELKAN

Impact build-up, severe case

Scenario stress: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Asset management.Nama contoh dan nilai ilustratif; sebuah rancangan, bukan catatan atau sistem yang aktif.
04Data

Apa yang digunakan metode ini.

Datasets and records used by scenario design and stress testing on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in register sumber.

DataPeranLabel
Skenario iklim NGFSMacro and sector pathwaysDIMODELKAN
Supervisory stress scenario frameworksSeverity and design referenceStatistik yang diterbitkan
Historical stress episodesAnalogues and calibrationTERAMATI
Portfolio and liability dataExposure to the shocksDILAPORKAN
05Model skenario

Risiko transisi dan fisik pada portofolio.

Tiga kelompok skenario mengikuti kerangka NGFS menggerakkan portofolio sektor melalui biaya karbon dan kerusakan akibat pemanasan; tampilan transmisi menelusuri kerugian hingga ke pemberi pinjaman, investor, keuangan publik, dan rumah tangga. Skenario: asumsi bernama tentang masa depan, bukan proyeksi.

Kendali

Harga karbon pada cakrawala, jalur teratur
200 per tCO2
Penundaan sebelum transisi yang tidak teratur
50% dari cakrawala
Biaya yang dibebankan kepada pelanggan
50%
Pemanasan saat ini di atas masa praindustri
1,30°C
Pemanasan per dekade, kebijakan saat ini
0,25°C
Koefisien kerusakan
0,24% per °C²
Tahun ke depan
25 tahun

Pembacaan

Skenario terburuk pada cakrawala
−33,6% dari nilai
Angka, metode, dan sumber
TahunTransisi teratur (% nilai)Transisi tertunda dan tidak teratur (% nilai)Kebijakan saat ini (% nilai)
0−0.38−0.38−0.38
3−2.87−0.53−0.67
6−5.36−0.68−0.97
9−7.84−0.84−1.27
12−10.33−0.99−1.57
15−12.82−7.12−1.87
18−15.31−15.05−2.17
21−17.80−23.00−2.48
24−20.29−30.94−2.79

Metode

  1. Kelompok skenario iklim NGFS (2023), Climate Scenarios for central banks and supervisors, Phase IV
  2. Uji tekanan iklim terhadap sistem keuangan Battiston and others (2017), Nature Climate Change 7
  3. Fungsi kerusakan Nordhaus (2017), Revisiting the social cost of carbon, PNAS 114
  4. Saluran transmisi BCBS (2021), Climate-related risk drivers and their transmission channels
  5. Kipas ketidakpastian (Monte Carlo parametrik) Spiegelhalter, Pearson dan Short (2011), Memvisualisasikan ketidakpastian tentang masa depan, Science 333
  6. Sensitivitas satu per satu (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Data

The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page’s map can draw:

  • Luasan perkotaan Natural Earth
  • Pelabuhan laut Natural Earth
  • Tahun lalu, suhu harian (ERA5 melalui Open-Meteo) Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), Copernicus ERA5 (C3S/ECMWF) · register open-meteo.public-pages
  • Suhu udara permukaan, siang hari (AIRS) NASA AIRS · register nasa.gibs.context-live-layers
Risiko transisi dan fisik pada portofolio. Model pengajaran ilustratif: model ini berjalan pada nilai yang ditetapkan oleh kontrol, bukan pada data terukur. Metode: keluarga skenario iklim (NGFS (2023), Climate Scenarios for central banks and supervisors, Phase IV); uji stres iklim sistem keuangan (Battiston dkk. (2017), Nature Climate Change 7); fungsi kerusakan (Nordhaus (2017), Revisiting the social cost of carbon, PNAS 114).

Di seluruh enam pilar, dipimpin oleh Nexus Consortium

06Validasi

Cara hasil diperiksa.

Scenarios are reviewed for plausibility, internal consistency and severity relative to history. Exercise outcomes are compared with actual events when they occur.

PemeriksaanCara pelaksanaannya
Plausibility and severity reviewScenarios are compared with historical episodes and with supervisory severity levels
Internal consistencyShocked variables are checked against each other so no scenario combines incompatible paths
Assumption registerEvery behavioural and pricing assumption is listed with its source and the sensitivity of the result to it

Scenario choice can reflect prevailing assumptions and miss novel combinations. Results depend on how participants and models represent responses.

07Eksposur, kerugian, dan modal

What scenario analysis for portfolios means for exposure, loss and capital.

Tampilan eksposur, kerugian, skenario, dan modal yang akan diminta oleh pejabat risiko, otoritas pengawas, atau kementerian keuangan, beserta kerangka pelaporan yang mereka gunakan. Strukturnya mengikuti praktik pengawasan dan aktuaria. Nilai bersifat ilustratif: tidak pernah merupakan harga, peringkat, atau saran.

Jalur skenario

How scenario analysis for portfolios could be stressed under the scenario families central banks and supervisors use.

TeraturTidak teraturDunia rumah kaca202520302035204020452050tinggirendah
Kelompok skenarioRisiko transisiRisiko fisikApa yang ditanyakan uji tekanan
TeraturKebijakan dini dan bertahapLebih rendahDapatkah portofolio menyerap penetapan ulang harga yang bertahap?
Tidak teraturKebijakan terlambat dan mendadakRendah hingga sedangApa yang rusak saat terjadi penetapan ulang harga mendadak dan migrasi kredit?
Dunia rumah kacaKebijakan terbatasTinggi dan meningkatDi mana kerugian fisik terkonsentrasi dalam agunan dan asuransi?
Kelompok skenario sebagaimana didefinisikan oleh NGFS; kurvanya adalah indeks tekanan gabungan ilustratif, bukan variabel atau prakiraan NGFS.
Skenario iklim NGFS · Network for Greening the Financial SystemIFRS S2 Pengungkapan terkait Iklim · ISSBRekomendasi TCFD · Financial Stability Board TCFDPrinsip-prinsip pengelolaan efektif risiko keuangan terkait iklim · Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
09Pengelolaan

Siapa yang memelihara metode ini.

Manajemen Risiko Sistemik stewards scenario design and stress testing for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

11Pertanyaan

Tanya jawab.

What are the limits of scenario design and stress testing in this field?
Scenario choice can reflect prevailing assumptions and miss novel combinations. Results depend on how participants and models represent responses.
Bagaimana hasil diperiksa?
Scenarios are reviewed for plausibility, internal consistency and severity relative to history. Exercise outcomes are compared with actual events when they occur.
Apakah nilai di halaman ini nyata?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method’s use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Di mana lagi metode ini diterapkan?
Observatory Halaman metode kanonis mencantumkan setiap platform yang menerapkannya.
LaporanBerkontribusi

Kontribusikan bukti dari halaman ini.

Laporan is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks AllianceAsset Management NexusKesiapan Pembiayaan dan AsuransiSkenario dan Uji Tekanan
Asset Management Nexus

Ajukan pertanyaan eksposur atau modal kepada Aliansi.

Informasi dan pertanyaan sudah terbuka hari ini. Sebuah pertanyaan menerima nomor referensi dan menyebutkan langkah berikutnya; lamaran, pembayaran, alokasi komputasi, dan pendaftaran hanya dibuka ketika tim, ketentuan, dan kapasitas tinjauannya tersedia.