Skip to content

GRA · Payments and Market Infrastructure

Spatial financeWhere capital meets hazard, exposure and transition

Payment and financial market technology at Payments and Market Infrastructure

Payments technology covers the سیستەمەکان, messages and settlement mechanisms that move money and securities. On this platform it explains how design choices such as settlement asset, timing, messaging standard and liquidity tools shape risk in payment and market infrastructure.

01تۆمارکردن

Payment and financial market technology at Payments and Market Infrastructure on the record.

Method recordSTEM method
  1. ڕێگاتەکنەلۆجیای پارەدان و بازاڕی دارایی
  2. پارێزەرپارەدان و ژێرخانی بازاڕ
  3. Applied inپارەدان و ژێرخانی بازاڕ
  4. داتا3 inputs
  5. Canonical pageSTEM Commons
02بەکارهێنان

What payment and financial market technology does here.

Payment and financial market technology covers the سیستەمەکان that clear and settle transactions and support trading. Their continuity is essential for economic activity and crisis response. In financial stability, cyber and digital resilience and digital public infrastructure, payments analysis shows how operational outages or cyber events can freeze liquidity across the economy. It informs resilience standards and contingency arrangements. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.

Liquidity-saving mechanisms

Queues and offsetting algorithms in large-value systems are analysed for how much intraday liquidity they save and how they behave under participant stress.

ISO 20022 data quality

Structured message fields are examined for how they improve screening, reconciliation and straight-through processing across borders.

Settlement cycle design

Effects of moving to shorter settlement cycles on funding, fails and operations are compared across markets that have changed.

03Stress test

How a shock to assets becomes a system loss.

The equity the system loses after interbank contagion, against the initial hit, as leverage, interconnection and recovery rates change, the core of a macroprudential تاقیکردنەوەی فشاری. Teaching model with stated illustrative values, not a prediction.

کۆنترۆڵەکان

Fall in external assets
2.0%
Leverage (assets over equity)
10 times
Interbank share of assets
10%
Recovery on interbank claims
40%
Banks in the system
20
Core banks
20% of banks

خوێندنەوەکان

Equity lost to the initial shock
18.0%
Equity lost after contagion
45.0%
Added by contagion (DebtRank)
27.0 points
Banks in default
0
ژمارە، ڕێگا و سەرچاوەکان
RoundSystem equity lost (%)Banks in default
018.000
128.800
235.280
339.170
441.500
542.900
643.740
744.240
844.550
944.730
1044.840
1144.900
1244.940
1344.960
1444.980
1544.990
1644.990
1745.000
1845.000
1945.000
2045.000
2145.000
2245.000
2345.000
2445.000
2545.000
2645.000
2745.000
2845.000
2945.000
3045.000

ڕێگاکان

  1. DebtRank Battiston and others (2012), Scientific Reports 2:541
  2. Differential DebtRank Bardoscia and others (2015), PLOS ONE 10
  3. Contagion in financial networks Gai and Kapadia (2010), Proc. R. Soc. A 466
  4. Clearing in financial networks Eisenberg and Noe (2001), Management Science 47
  5. پەنجەی نادڵنیایی (مۆنتی کارلۆی پارامیتەر) Spiegelhalter, Pearson و Short (2011)، Visualising uncertainty about the future، Science 333
  6. هەستیاریی یەک-یەک (تۆرناد) Saltelli و ئەوانی دیکە (2008)، Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer، Wiley

داتا

No observed data enters this model: it runs on the teaching values set by the controls, to be replaced with a programme’s own evidence.

How a shock to assets becomes a system loss. Illustrative teaching model: it runs on the values set by the controls, not on measured data. Methods: DebtRank (Battiston and others (2012), Scientific Reports 2:541); Differential DebtRank (Bardoscia and others (2015), PLOS ONE 10); Contagion in financial networks (Gai and Kapadia (2010), Proc. R. Soc. A 466).

لە ناو شەش کۆڵەکەکەدا، بە سەرپەرشتیی Nexus Consortium

04داتا

What the method consumes.

Datasets and records used by payment and financial market technology on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.

داتاڕۆڵناونیشان
Payment system statisticsVolumes and valuesئامارە بڵاوکراوەکان
Message standards documentationData structureئامارە بڵاوکراوەکان
Settlement fail dataSettlement performanceئامارە بڵاوکراوەکان
05Exposure, loss and capital

What it means for exposure, loss and capital.

The exposure, loss, scenario and capital views a risk officer, supervisor or ministry of finance would ask for, with the frameworks they report against. Structures follow supervisory and actuarial practice. Values are illustrative: never prices, ratings or advice.

Transmission channels

How a shock in Payment and financial market technology at Payments and Market Infrastructure reaches credit, market, underwriting, liquidity and operational risk, and feeds back.

Channel structure after the Basel Committee’s work on climate-related risk drivers and transmission channels; links shown are typical paths, not estimated exposures.
NGFS climate scenarios · Network for Greening the Financial SystemIFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures · ISSBTCFD recommendations · Financial Stability Board TCFDPrinciples for the effective management of climate-related financial risks · Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
06پشتڕاستکردنەوە

How results are checked.

سیستەمەکان are tested through failover exercises, liquidity simulations and supervisory oversight. Reconciliation checks the integrity of settled positions.

بپشکنەHow it is done
Design documentationAnalyses state the version of rules and standards examined
ComparabilityStatistics are reconciled across systems before comparison
Operator reviewTechnical descriptions are checked against published system rules

Interdependence among participants and third-party providers can produce unexpected failures. Simulations may not capture behavioural responses under stress.

08Stewardship

Who maintains the method.

Payments and Market Infrastructure stewards payment and financial market technology for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

09پرسیارەکان

پرسیار و وەڵام.

What are the limits of payment and financial market technology in this field?
Interdependence among participants and third-party providers can produce unexpected failures. Simulations may not capture behavioural responses under stress.
How are results checked?
Systems are tested through failover exercises, liquidity simulations and supervisory oversight. Reconciliation checks the integrity of settled positions.
Are the values on this page real?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method’s use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Where else is this method applied?
ئەو canonical method page lists every platform that applies it.
Reportsبەشداربە

لەم لاپەڕەیەوە بەڵگە پێشکەش بکە.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks Allianceپارەدان و ژێرخانی بازاڕسیستەمە ستراتیژییەکانسیناریۆ و تاقیکردنەوەی گوشار
پارەدان و ژێرخانی بازاڕ

Bring an exposure or capital question to the Alliance.

زانیاری و پرسیار ئەمڕۆ کراوەن. پرسیارێک ژمارەی ئاماژەی پێدەدرێت و هەنگاوی دواتر دیاری دەکات؛ داواکاری، پارەدان، تەرخانکردنی کۆمپیوتەر و تۆمارکردن تەنیا کاتێک دەکرێنەوە کە تیم، مەرج و توانای پێداچوونەوەیان هەبێت.