Skip to content

GRA · Insurance Nexus

Spatial financeWhere capital meets hazard, exposure and transition

Actuarial mathematics in insurance

Actuarial mathematics is the core discipline of insurance: it turns claims experience, exposure and assumptions into premiums, reserves and capital. On this platform it frames how expected loss and its uncertainty are estimated, and where professional judgement and standards set the boundaries.

02Serlêdan

What actuarial mathematics does here.

Actuarial mathematics applies probability, statistics and financial theory to measure and price contingent risks, particularly in insurance and pensions. It determines reserves and premiums for uncertain future obligations. In insurance and catastrophe, climate and hazards and health and biosecurity, actuarial methods determine whether risks can be insured and at what cost. They help assess accumulation of correlated losses across portfolios and regions. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.

Loss reserving with development triangles

Paid and incurred claims are arranged by origin and development period, and chain ladder, Bornhuetter-Ferguson and stochastic methods project ultimate losses, with the spread between methods reported as part of the uncertainty.

Experience rating and credibility

A portfolio’s own claims experience is blended with a wider benchmark in proportion to its credibility, so small books are not priced on noise and large books are not priced on someone else’s experience.

Mortality improvement assumptions

Graduated mortality rates are combined with improvement scales fitted to population and insured data, and the resulting annuity values are tested against alternative scales to show their sensitivity.

03Çavdêrî bike

Tail fit.

The screen a team would use to follow this method: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Tail fit

Insurance · Actuarial mathematics in insurance · Run R-7651

Shape parameter uncertainGRA · Insurance Nexus

Return level curve

Method card

Rêbaz
Actuarial mathematics
Nêzîkatî
peaks over threshold
Threshold
98th percentile
Nîşan
MODELKIRÎ

Parameters

generalised Pareto fit

Shape ξ0.07−0.060.41heavy tail if above zero
Scale σ2.60.97.3units of the variable
Exceedances57declustered
Tail fit: the screen’s structure, terms and states for Insurance.Nav û nirxên nimûneyî; sêwiran e, ne qeyd an pergaleke zindî ye.
04Dane

What the method consumes.

Datasets and records used by actuarial mathematics on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.

DaneRolNîşan
Loss development trianglesReservingStatîstîkên weşandî
Policy and exposure dataPricing and experience ratingREPORTED
Mortality and morbidity tablesLife and health assumptionsTEXMÎNKIRÎ
Modela karesatê event loss tablesCatastrophe load and accumulationMODELKIRÎ
Price and inflation indicesTrend and discountingStatîstîkên weşandî
05Loss model

Loss exceedance, average annual loss and probable maximum loss.

The loss a portfolio in the footprint can expect per year and at the 1 in 100 and 1 in 250 levels that insurers and lenders price, from the same three blocks every catastrophe model uses. Teaching model with stated illustrative values, not a prediction.

Kontrol

Typical annual hazard intensity (location)
1.00 intensity index
Belavbûna nirxên tund (pîvan)
0.80 intensity index
Tundiya ku nîvê nirxê tê de winda dibe
4.00 intensity index
Belavbûna lawazî
0.55
Para nirxê di nav şopa metirsî de
40%
Standarda parastinê (heyama vegerê)
50 sal

Xwendin

Windahiya salane ya navînî
0.51% of value
Windahî di 1 ji 100 salan de
24.5% of value
Windahî di 1 ji 250 salan de
28.4% of value
Tundî di 1 ji 100 salan de
4.68 intensity index
Jimar, rêbaz û çavkanî
Heyama vegerê (sal)Intensity (intensity index)Windahî (% ya nirxê)
10.090.00
21.270.00
41.910.00
72.470.00
133.000.00
243.510.00
444.020.00
824.5323.55
1545.0326.44
2875.5328.87
5366.0330.88
1,0006.5332.53

Rêbaz

  1. Metirsî: nirxên dawîn ên Gumbel Gumbel (1958), Statistics of Extremes, Columbia University Press
  2. Nazikiya lognormal (lawazî) FEMA (2003), HAZUS-MH Technical Manual
  3. Qada îhtîmala derbasbûnê û windahiya salane ya navînî Grossi and Kunreuther (2005), Catastrophe Modeling, Springer
  4. Bandora bendavê Di Baldassarre and others (2013), Socio-hydrology, HESS 17
  5. Pankeya nediyarîyê (Monte Carlo ya parametreyan) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  6. Hesasiyeta yek-yek (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Dane

The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page’s map can draw:

  • Çem Natural Earth
  • Dirêjahiyên bajarî Natural Earth
  • Bajar Natural Earth
  • Erdhejên M4.5+, hefteya borî (USGS) U.S. Geological Survey · register usgs.earthquake.summary-feeds
  • Rêjeya baranê, nîv saeta dawîn (IMERG) NASA GPM IMERG Early · register nasa.gibs.context-live-layers
  • Pêşbînî: herikîna çemê, 30 roj bi navber (GloFAS bi riya Open-Meteo) Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), Copernicus GloFAS · register open-meteo.public-pages
  • Berfirehiya avakirî û niştecihbûnê, 2010 (HBASE, Landsat) CIESIN/Columbia, NASA SEDAC HBASE · register sedac.context-urban-layers
Loss exceedance, average annual loss and probable maximum loss. Illustrative teaching model: it runs on the values set by the controls, not on measured data. Methods: Gumbel extreme-value hazard (Gumbel (1958), Statistics of Extremes, Columbia University Press); Lognormal fragility (vulnerability) (FEMA (2003), HAZUS-MH Technical Manual); Exceedance-probability curve and average annual loss (Grossi and Kunreuther (2005), Catastrophe Modeling, Springer).

Li seranserê şeş stûnan, bi pêşengiya Nexus Consortium

06Erêkirin

How results are checked.

Assumptions are tested through experience studies and actual-versus-expected analysis. Independent actuarial review checks methods and results.

Kontrol bikinHow it is done
Actual versus expectedEmerging experience is compared with assumed claims each period, and persistent deviations trigger review of the assumption
Reserve back-testingPast reserve estimates are compared with later ultimate losses to measure adequacy and bias
Independent actuarial reviewMethods and assumptions are reviewed by an actuary not involved in the work, against the applicable professional standards
Sensitivity reportingKey assumptions are varied and the effect on premiums, reserves and capital is reported beside the central estimate

Historical experience may not reflect emerging or correlated risks. Long-tail liabilities are sensitive to assumptions about future trends.

07Exposure, loss and capital

What actuarial mathematics in insurance means for exposure, loss and capital.

The exposure, loss, scenario and capital views a risk officer, supervisor or ministry of finance would ask for, with the frameworks they report against. Structures follow supervisory and actuarial practice. Values are illustrative: never prices, ratings or advice.

Exposure and loss at return periods

How losses from actuarial mathematics in insurance grow with severity, gross and net of reinsurance, against capital.

1 in 101 in 501 in 1001 in 250grossnet of reinsurance800
Return periodAnnual probabilityGross lossNet lossNet, capital = 100
1 in 100.10141010
1 in 500.02332121
1 in 1000.01462727
1 in 2500.004683939
Windahiya salane ya navînî3.12.22.2
Illustrative loss index for a example portfolio (capital = 100): the exceedance-probability form insurers and supervisors read. Not data on any institution, not a price or a rating.
NGFS climate scenarios · Network for Greening the Financial SystemIFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures · ISSBTCFD recommendations · Financial Stability Board TCFDPrinciples for the effective management of climate-related financial risks · Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
09Stewardship

Who maintains the method.

Xetera aktuarî û hejmarî stewards actuarial mathematics for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

11Pirs

Pirs û bersiv.

What are the limits of actuarial mathematics in this field?
Historical experience may not reflect emerging or correlated risks. Long-tail liabilities are sensitive to assumptions about future trends.
How are results checked?
Assumptions are tested through experience studies and actual-versus-expected analysis. Independent actuarial review checks methods and results.
Are the values on this page real?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method’s use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Where else is this method applied?
Çavdêrxaneya canonical method page lists every platform that applies it.
rêzeya Pergalên StratejîkTevkarî bike

Ji vê rûpelê delîl bidin.

rêzeya Pergalên Stratejîk is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks AllianceInsurance NexusAmadebûna fînans û sîgortayêXetere û berxwedana sektorî ya cîhanî
Insurance Nexus

Bring an exposure or capital question to the Alliance.

Agahî û pirs îro vekirî ne. Pirsek referansekê distîne û gava piştî wê dide nasîn; serlêdan, drav, veqetandina hesabkirinê û tomarkirin tenê dema ku tîm, mercên wê û kapasîteya vekolînê hebin vedibin.