GRA · Financial Crime and Fraud Risk

Spatial financeWhere capital meets hazard, exposure and transition

Research and industry programmes

Programmes follow how financial crime is governed: FATF standards, regional bodies and mutual evaluations, and national authorities and financial intelligence units. The platform supplies public evidence only.

01Workspace

The workspace for research and industry programmes.

Programme board

Bank B monitoring · Research and industry · Cycle 2 of 4 · Example interface, not a record

  • Workstreams active
    7Active
  • Milestones due this quarter
    5Watch
  • Decisions pending with owners
    2Watch
  • Open risks
    6
Quarter review dueGRA · Financial Crime and Fraud Risk

Workstreams

by stage

Scoping02
Scenario tuningWS-540 · owner: MLRO
Network analytics pilotWS-651 · owner: Financial intelligence unit liaison
In delivery02
Trade-based laundering typologiesMilestone M2 · slipping
FIU feedback loopMilestone M5 · on plan
Review01
Customer risk model refreshIndependent reviewer named
Closed01
Fraud and AML convergenceClosure note on record

Gates

  1. Requestowner named
  2. Scoping noteboundary
  3. Qualifiedinputs
  4. BuildFoundry
  5. Testcontrolled
  6. Publishwith limits
  7. Decisionauthority
Programme board.Illustrative interface; not live data.

Financial Crime and Fraud Risk · Programme board. Programme board: example names and illustrative values, not a record.

03What each examines

What each examines.

LevelQuestions
GlobalFATF standards and typologies
RegionalMutual evaluations and corridor risks
NationalRisk assessments and programme controls

Financial Crime and Fraud Risk programme work is read against FATF (Recommendations), Egmont Group (FIU cooperation) and National authorities (sanctions regimes). National entries would draw on public typologies and statistics, and each would state which values are observed, published statistics, modelled or unknown.

04Process

How the process runs.

Process explorer · Process

Research and industry programmes: Policy question to decision

9 steps5 stages1 gate

Process

Research and industry programmes: Policy question to decision

A priority becomes a question, evidence, a decision case and a limited publication; the competent authority decides, never the programme.

  1. 01 Question

    1. 01A priority becomes a questionStep · Universe; national counterpartsA priority becomes a researchable question with stated criteria. National counterparts own the agenda, data and decisions.
    2. 03Scientific and stakeholder challengeStep · the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI); the Global Risks Forum (GRF)Scientific and affected-stakeholder challenge informs mission selection and methods.
  2. 02 Evidence and options

    1. 04Assemble the evidenceStep · GCRIMethods, labelled data and uncertainty are assembled. Every finding carries one of nine evidence labels.
    2. 06Decision case with optionsRecord · The decision owner named in the caseA decision case binds owner, alternatives, evidence and deadline. It needs sensitivity and robustness.
  3. 03 Review and publication

    1. 07G6 · Publication authorisedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF authorises publication of results that have passed scientific and editorial review. It cannot publish personal data.
    2. 08Publish with method, uncertainty and limitsRecord · ReportsFindings are published with their method, uncertainty and limits. An edition is published after review, not to a calendar.
  4. 04 Outside the programme

    1. 02Competent authority decidesDecision · The competent authorityThe authority or institution decides under its own rules. The authority decides; the programme informs.
    2. 05Action and implementation stay with the ownersActor · The relevant government, operator or licensed institutionDecisions and execution stay with the relevant government, operator or licensed institution. The programme records one only if shared.
  5. 05 Learning

    1. 09Corrections and lessons feed the next agendaStep · UniverseCorrections and lessons feed the next annual agenda. The findings of one year set the mandate of the next.

The Nexus cycle · Decision rights · The programme yearDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation.

05Status

Every programme shows where it stands.

A programme is shown as exploring, forming, constituted, active, paused or archived, according to its record. A plan is never presented as an activity.

06Sources

Where this page's references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

08Questions

Questions and answers.

How does a country take part?
Through its national programme. Country enquiries go to the Consortium Secretariat at Contact or a regional desk.
Financial Crime and Fraud Risk

Bring an exposure or capital question to the Alliance.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Risks Alliance

Finance · trust · precision

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GRA is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.