The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)
Financial stability analysis studies the resilience of the financial system as a whole: whether it can keep providing credit, payments, insurance and market liquidity through shocks, or whether it amplifies them. It combines macroeconomics, finance, network science and the study of institutions. On Financial Stability, The Global Risks Alliance (GRA) treats the discipline as shared industry research, not as policy or execution.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 2
Activity and exposure, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For financial discipline overview, in GRA's spatial-finance reading, the map opens on population density and night lights with built-up and settlement extent from NASA GIBS, framed on Europe; 3 further NASA layers wait in the list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
The Financial Stability sector overview covers system-wide vulnerabilities, contagion, nonbank intermediation and institutional recovery questions. It sets out who is in scope, from macroprudential researchers and systemic-risk analysts, how risk reaches the sector and how it travels onward, analysed with network analysis, stress scenarios and financial stability research. GRA builds shared industry understanding and does not advise, rate or assess individual firms.
Fig.How GCRI, GRF and GRA share one field while the authorities decide. Design, not a record.
The working screen behind this subject: its structure, terms and states. Names are placeholders and values illustrative.
How leverage, credit and asset prices build up in booms and unwind in busts, so that risk is created when it looks lowest.
How exposures, common holdings and shared infrastructure connect institutions at any point in time.
Booms deepen connections, and dense connections make busts spread faster.
Financial Stability frames are set by FSB, BIS and CGFS and NGFS.
| Part | Channel Financial Stability studies |
|---|---|
| Banks | Credit, funding and payments |
| Insurers | Claims and asset sales |
| Nonbanks | Leverage and redemptions |
| Infrastructure | Clearing and settlement |
Shocks travel between these parts, and Financial Stability studies the links: When does a local loss become a system-wide one? The evidence base is BIS statistics, sector aggregates and network models.
| Vulnerability | Why it matters | Typical indicators |
|---|---|---|
| Leverage | Magnifies losses relative to capital | Debt relative to income or equity across sectors |
| Maturity and liquidity mismatch | Creates exposure to funding runs | Short-term funding of long-term or illiquid assets |
| Asset valuations | Stretched prices can fall sharply | Valuations relative to fundamentals and history |
| Interconnectedness | Spreads distress between institutions | Bilateral exposures and common holdings |
| Concentration | Creates single points of failure | Dependence on few providers or counterparties |
Indicators describe conditions, not probabilities of crisis.
Each institution weighs its own risks, not the costs its distress would impose on others. Fire sales, funding runs and credit crunches impose losses on firms and households that had no part in the original decisions. Because these spillovers are not priced, the system as a whole tends to carry more leverage and liquidity risk than is socially optimal, which is why authorities pursue financial stability as a public policy objective.
For the industry, shared understanding of these spillovers is a common interest. It improves each firm's view of the conditions it operates in, and it gives the profession a common language with the authorities and researchers who study the system.
Network, scenario and econometric methods that the industry can examine.
Evidence is aggregated so that no institution or position can be identified.
GRA publishes aggregated research. It assesses no firm, sets no policy and advises no one.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Transmission channel | The route by which a shock reaches financial institutions' balance sheets. |
| Systemic risk | The risk of disruption to financial services caused by impairment of all or parts of the financial system, with serious consequences for the real economy, as the IMF, FSB and BIS define it. |
| Macroprudential policy | Policy that aims to keep the financial system as a whole resilient by limiting system-wide risk. |
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.