Skip to content

GRA · Financial Cyber and Operational Resilience

Spatial financeWhere capital meets hazard, exposure and transition

Critical business services

Operational resilience starts by deciding which services matter most: payments, account access, claims payment, trading, custody. Firms map the people, processes, technology, facilities and suppliers each service depends on, and set how much disruption is tolerable. This page sets out how critical services are identified and protected, where mapping fails, the records involved, and who decides.

02The question

Critical business services: how the risk develops.

Identifying service continuity outcomes. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mechanism

Services, not systems

Resilience is judged by whether customers and markets receive a service, not whether a single system runs. A firm can keep systems up and still fail the service.

Mechanism

Hidden dependencies

Mapping often stops at the first layer. Shared data centres, single staff with key knowledge and subcontracted suppliers stay hidden until they fail.

Mechanism

Tolerances set the bar

Impact tolerances define the maximum acceptable outage or data loss. Tolerances set too loosely let investment decisions ignore resilience gaps.

Mechanism

Boards own the outcome

Boards approve important services and tolerances. Where they delegate this entirely, resilience is treated as an IT matter rather than a service promise.

03Spatial finance

Settlement dependencies, and what fails with a node.

How a failure at one financial centre can spread through settlement links. Design links, not real dependencies.

Sixteen financial centres, and how a failure at one spreads through settlement links.Design links, not the real dependencies of any infrastructure.
04Indicators

What is measured, and how well.

Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.

IndicatorUnitCadenceSource typeLabel
Important business services identifiedcountannualFirm self-assessmentsDECLARED
Impact tolerances settime or volume per serviceannualFirm self-assessmentsDECLARED
Services mapped to all dependency layersshare of important servicesannualMapping recordsDECLARED
Services within tolerance in severe scenario testsshare of services testedannualScenario test recordsDECLARED
Single points of failure identifiedcount per serviceannualMapping recordsDECLARED
Remediation investment for resilience gapscurrencyannualFirm plansDECLARED
05Monitor

Important business services.

The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Important business services

Critical business services · Bank B services · Self-assessment 1

One service outside toleranceGRA · Financial Cyber and Operational Resilience

Services vs impact tolerance

Make a payment32Cloud region lossOutside
Access cash1215Cyber attackWithin
Mortgage servicing6045Data centre lossWithin
Claims payment4154Third-party failureOutside

Dependency map

people · process · technology · third parties

Remediation

  1. R-1Second claims platform supplierExit plan tested176 d
  2. R-2Immutable backups for paymentsCyber recovery50 d
Important business services: the screen's structure, terms and states for Critical business services.Example names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
06Sources

Where the evidence comes from.

Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.

SourceWhat it givesLicence class
Bank of England, PRA and FCA operational resilience policy and statementsRequirements and supervisory observationsFree, Bank of England and FCA terms
BCBS Principles for Operational ResilienceInternational expectations for banksFree, BIS terms
DORA regulatory technical standardsEU requirements for ICT risk and critical functionsFree, EU reuse terms
IOSCO and IAIS operational resilience reportsExpectations for securities and insurance firmsFree, IOSCO and IAIS terms
Supervisory thematic review findingsObservations on firms' implementationFree, terms per supervisor
07Twin and cascade simulator

Trace a shock in critical business services to the balance sheet.

Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile Cyber resilience and digital operational resilience: the shocks it names, the systems and sectors that carry the loss, the controls that dampen it and the data that observe it. Pick an initiating shock and step through the cascade to see which exposures it reaches and where losses could concentrate. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every weight is a stated assumption. An exercise, not a forecast, a valuation, a rating or investment advice. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.

Hazards

  • Dam failure
  • River flood (set off downstream)
  • Flash flood (set off downstream)
  • Mass displacement (set off downstream)
  • Widespread power outage (set off downstream)
  • Water supply shortfall (set off downstream)

Controls

  • NS-0 Constitution and principles
  • NS-9 Contextual UNIs (deployments, instances, programme instances)
  • NS-10 Policies and clauses (machine-readable obligations: definition, binding, evaluation and enforcement)
  • NS-11 Verification and monitoring (evidence, attestations, zero-trust conformance observation)
  • NS-12 Software, model and AI/ML artefacts (supply chain, model cards, dataset sheets)
  • NRS-X6 Cyber and digital security risk
  • NRS-H54 Hazard family: Signal and platform disruption (NHS-1 cyber.platform)
  • NRS-P10 Third-party, outsourcing and concentration risk
  • NRS-H107 Hazard family: Digital infrastructure concentration and monoculture (NHS-1 tech.digital-concentration)
  • NRS-K31 Domain pack profile: Cyber national resilience (DOMAIN-031)
  • NRS-S7 System profile: NXS-EOP (Earth observation and digital twins)

Observation

  • Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue (listed for reference)
  • National Vulnerability Database (CVE enrichment API) (listed for reference)
  • OSV open source vulnerability database (listed for reference)
  • Proportion of population covered by a mobile network, by technology

Example geography

  • North America: 243 hexagonal cells
  • Night lights tonight, outages (VIIRS Day/Night Band), NASA GIBS
  • Surface water through cloud, 30 m (OPERA DSWx-S1 radar), NASA GIBS
  • Rain rate, last half hour (IMERG), NASA GIBS
  • Surface soil moisture (SMAP), NASA GIBS
08Decisions

Who decides, and what the evidence serves.

Financial Cyber and Operational Resilience prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Who decidesThe questionEvidence this page serves
BoardsWhich services are important and what tolerances applyService maps, harm analysis and test results
Prudential and conduct supervisorsWhether firms' services and tolerances are credibleSelf-assessments and thematic review findings
Chief operating and technology officersWhich resilience gaps to fix firstMapping, scenario results and cost evidence
Internal auditWhether mapping and testing are complete and reliableMapping records and test evidence

Outputs this topic produces

  • Guide to identifying important business services and impact tolerances
  • Method note on mapping dependencies beyond the first layer
  • Brief on supervisory observations about tolerance setting
  • Questions for boards approving important services
09Exposure, loss and capital

What critical business services means for exposure, loss and capital.

The exposure, loss, scenario and capital views a risk officer, supervisor or ministry of finance would ask for, with the frameworks they report against. Structures follow supervisory and actuarial practice. Values are illustrative: never prices, ratings or advice.

Transmission channels

How a shock in critical business services reaches credit, market, underwriting, liquidity and operational risk, and feeds back.

Channel structure after the Basel Committee's work on climate-related risk drivers and transmission channels; links shown are typical paths, not estimated exposures.
NGFS climate scenarios · Network for Greening the Financial SystemIFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures · ISSBTCFD recommendations · Financial Stability Board TCFDPrinciples for the effective management of climate-related financial risks · Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
10Core questions

What service identification asks.

  • Which services, if disrupted, would cause intolerable harm, and to whom: individual customers, markets or the wider economy?
  • What is the maximum tolerable disruption for each, in time or volume?
  • Which people, processes, technology, facilities, data and third parties does each service depend on?
  • Which services matter for the financial system, not just for the firm?
11Mechanisms

Why service-based thinking matters.

Firms historically organised resilience around systems and departments. Customers experience services, which cut across many systems and departments, so a service view reveals dependencies that a systems view misses.

Outcomes

Harm to people

Defining services by the harm their loss would cause keeps attention on customers and markets.

Mapping

End-to-end view

A service view traces every dependency, including third parties, rather than stopping at the firm's boundary.

Priorities

Focus

Identifying what matters most directs investment where disruption would hurt most.

12Methods and limits

How services are identified and mapped.

  1. 01

    Impact analysis

    Assessing the harm of disruption over time for each service. Limits: harm to the wider system is hard to estimate from inside one firm.

  2. 02

    Dependency mapping

    Tracing resources each service needs, using reliability and resilience engineering. Limits: maps become outdated as systems change.

  3. 03

    Tolerance setting

    Defining maximum tolerable disruption. Limits: requires judgement and can be set to fit current capability rather than real harm.

  4. 04

    Sector-level aggregation

    Identifying services that are critical across the industry, using network science. Limits: depends on comparable definitions across firms.

13Methods

How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.

  1. Reliability and resilience engineeringService and dependency mapping · Recovery strategy comparison · Learning reviewsApplied here
  2. Network science and contagionSector dependency maps · Outage propagation · Software component networksApplied here
  3. Cybersecurity and cryptographyIdentity and privileged access · Detection and response capability · Threat-led testingApplied here
14Questions

Questions and answers.

What is an important business service?
A service a firm provides to an external user whose disruption could cause intolerable harm to customers or risk to market integrity or financial stability, in UK regulatory terms.
How is an impact tolerance different from a recovery time objective?
An impact tolerance is set from the harm to users and markets; a recovery time objective is an internal target for restoring a system. Several systems may support one service.
Why map people and facilities as well as technology?
Because services depend on staff, buildings and suppliers too, and a disruption to any of them can stop a service even when systems work.
Is an important business service the same as a critical system?
No. A service is what customers or markets receive. Many systems support one service, and one system may support several services.
Who sets impact tolerances?
Each firm's board, under supervisory expectations where they apply.
Does the platform review firms' service lists?
No. It publishes sector-level research and playbooks that firms can use at their own discretion.
Why look at services across the whole sector?
Because some services, such as retail payments, matter to the economy as a whole, and disruption at several firms at once can cause harm that no single firm's analysis captures.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks AllianceFinancial Cyber and Operational ResilienceScenario and Stress-TestStrategic Systems
Financial Cyber and Operational Resilience

Bring an exposure or capital question to the Alliance.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.