Skip to content

GRA · Disaster Risk Finance

Spatial financeWhere capital meets hazard, exposure and transition

Economics and development economics for disaster risk finance

Economics studies how disasters affect output, budgets and households, and how financing choices change outcomes. In disaster risk finance it supplies cost-benefit analysis of instruments and investments, fiscal impact estimates and evaluation of household effects.

01Register

Economics and development economics for disaster risk finance on the record.

Method recordSTEM method
  1. MethodEconomics and development economics
  2. Applied inDisaster Risk Finance
  3. Canonical pageSTEM Commons
02Application

What economics and development economics does here.

Economics and development economics study how societies produce, distribute and consume resources and how living standards change. They estimate the costs of shocks and the trade-offs among policy responses. In disaster and crisis, sovereign and public finance, development finance and insurance and catastrophe, economic analysis quantifies indirect losses as shocks spread through supply chains and labour markets. It supports prioritising investment in prevention and recovery. The canonical description is on the STEM Commons.

Cost of ex post versus ex ante finance

The cost of borrowing, reallocating and delaying after a disaster is compared with the cost of pre-arranged instruments over many simulated years.

Household welfare effects

Survey and administrative data are used to estimate how early cash affects consumption, assets and recovery, with comparison groups stated.

Fiscal impact of disasters

Revenue, spending and debt changes after past events are estimated to inform contingent liability assessments.

03Monitor

Econometric model.

The screen a team would use to follow this method: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.

Econometric model

Disaster risk finance · Economics and development · Run R-2436

Estimates stableGRA · Disaster Risk Finance

Estimates

robust standard errors

Contingent liability, 1-in-500.410.18[−0.4, 0.6]Yes
Pre-arranged finance−0.090.13[0.0, 0.8]Yes
Time to disburse0.100.05[−0.2, 0.4]Yes
Basis risk0.740.20[0.0, 0.3]Yes

Method card

Method
Economics and development economics
Sample
8053 obs
Design
panel, fixed effects
Label
MODELLED

Residuals by group

Econometric model: the screen's structure, terms and states for Disaster risk finance.Example names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
04Data

What the method consumes.

Datasets and records used by economics and development economics on this platform, with the role each plays and the label its values carry. Sources are listed in the source register.

DataRoleLabel
National accounts and fiscal dataMacro and budget effectsPublished statistics
Household surveysWelfare effectsOBSERVED
Programme evaluationsInstrument effectsESTIMATED
05Loss model

Loss exceedance, average annual loss and probable maximum loss.

The loss a portfolio in the footprint can expect per year and at the 1 in 100 and 1 in 250 levels that insurers and lenders price, from the same three blocks every catastrophe model uses. Teaching model with stated illustrative values, not a prediction.

Controls

Typical annual hazard intensity (location)
1.00 intensity index
Spread of extremes (scale)
0.80 intensity index
Intensity at which half the value is lost
4.00 intensity index
Dispersion of vulnerability
0.55
Share of value in the hazard footprint
40%
Protection standard (return period)
50 years

Readouts

Average annual loss
0.51% of value
Loss at 1 in 100 years
24.5% of value
Loss at 1 in 250 years
28.4% of value
Intensity at 1 in 100 years
4.68 intensity index
Numbers, methods and sources
Return period (years)Intensity (intensity index)Loss (% of value)
10.090.00
21.270.00
41.910.00
72.470.00
133.000.00
243.510.00
444.020.00
824.5323.55
1545.0326.44
2875.5328.87
5366.0330.88
1,0006.5332.53

Methods

  1. Gumbel extreme-value hazard Gumbel (1958), Statistics of Extremes, Columbia University Press
  2. Lognormal fragility (vulnerability) FEMA (2003), HAZUS-MH Technical Manual
  3. Exceedance-probability curve and average annual loss Grossi and Kunreuther (2005), Catastrophe Modeling, Springer
  4. Levee effect Di Baldassarre and others (2013), Socio-hydrology, HESS 17
  5. Uncertainty fan (parameter Monte Carlo) Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
  6. One-at-a-time sensitivity (tornado) Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley

Data

The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page's map can draw:

  • Rivers Natural Earth
  • Urban extents Natural Earth
  • Cities Natural Earth
  • Earthquakes M4.5+, past week (USGS) U.S. Geological Survey · register usgs.earthquake.summary-feeds
  • Rain rate, last half hour (IMERG) NASA GPM IMERG Early · register nasa.gibs.context-live-layers
  • River discharge forecast, 30 days with range (GloFAS via Open-Meteo) Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), Copernicus GloFAS · register open-meteo.public-pages
  • Built-up and settlement extent, 2010 (HBASE, Landsat) CIESIN/Columbia, NASA SEDAC HBASE · register sedac.context-urban-layers
Loss exceedance, average annual loss and probable maximum loss. Illustrative teaching model: it runs on the values set by the controls, not on measured data. Methods: Gumbel extreme-value hazard (Gumbel (1958), Statistics of Extremes, Columbia University Press); Lognormal fragility (vulnerability) (FEMA (2003), HAZUS-MH Technical Manual); Exceedance-probability curve and average annual loss (Grossi and Kunreuther (2005), Catastrophe Modeling, Springer).
06Validation

How results are checked.

Models are assessed against historical episodes and out-of-sample data. Parameter estimates are compared across studies and identification strategies.

CheckHow it is done
Counterfactual statedEach estimate states what it compares against
Discount rate sensitivityResults are shown across discount rates
External validityContext limits are stated with results

Equilibrium models may understate disruption and nonlinear cascades. Informal economies and non-market losses are poorly measured.

07Exposure, loss and capital

What it means for exposure, loss and capital.

The exposure, loss, scenario and capital views a risk officer, supervisor or ministry of finance would ask for, with the frameworks they report against. Structures follow supervisory and actuarial practice. Values are illustrative: never prices, ratings or advice.

Financing instruments by layer

How retention and transfer instruments could share losses from economics and development economics for disaster risk finance, from frequent to extreme.

Retention and reservesFrequent, low severityContingent creditModerateParametric cover and risk poolsSevereReinsurance and catastrophe bondsRare, extremeResidual lossBeyond all layersseverity rises upward
LayerWho holds the riskSpeed of fundsMain limit
Retention and reservesBudget, contingency fundsImmediateSize of the budget
Contingent creditDevelopment banks, ministries of financeDays to weeksDebt capacity
Parametric cover and risk poolsRegional pools, insurersDays, on a triggerBasis risk
Reinsurance and catastrophe bondsReinsurers, capital markets investorsWeeks to monthsCost of capital
Residual lossHouseholds, firms, humanitarian fundingUncertainUnfunded
Risk layering as described in disaster risk finance practice; instruments are illustrative of the structure, not offers, prices or advice.
NGFS climate scenarios · Network for Greening the Financial SystemIFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures · ISSBTCFD recommendations · Financial Stability Board TCFDPrinciples for the effective management of climate-related financial risks · Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
09Stewardship

Who maintains the method.

Economic Development stewards economics and development economics for the Consortium and reviews how it is applied across platforms.

11Questions

Questions and answers.

What are the limits of economics and development economics in this field?
Equilibrium models may understate disruption and nonlinear cascades. Informal economies and non-market losses are poorly measured.
How are results checked?
Models are assessed against historical episodes and out-of-sample data. Parameter estimates are compared across studies and identification strategies.
Are the values on this page real?
The data names, roles and checks are real descriptions of practice. The canvas shows a design of the method's use, not a run; no result is reported here.
Where else is this method applied?
The canonical method page lists every platform that applies it.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks AllianceDisaster Risk FinanceFinance and Insurance ReadinessPortfolio and Readiness
Disaster Risk Finance

Bring an exposure or capital question to the Alliance.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.