Executive summary

The edition on a few pages: the abstract, the key messages, the headline finding and what each steward reads in it.

5 min read1 figure0 tables16 notesNR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE

Contents
  1. ·Edition home
  2. ·Executive summary
    1. S.1 Abstract
    2. S.2 Key messages
    3. S.3 Headline finding
    4. S.4 At a glance
    5. S.5 What each steward reads in it
    6. S.6 What this edition is, and is not
  3. 1Crises are entangled, not stacked
  4. 2Key findings
  5. 3Systems and sectors at baseline
  6. 4Risks and capability
  7. 5Concurrent breadbasket shortfall and energy price shock
  8. 6Lenses and readings
  9. 7The 2027 agenda
  10. 8Systems in depth
  11. AMethodology
  12. BData appendix
  13. CReferences and record
  14. ·Complete edition, for print

S.1Abstract

The world in 2026 faces crises that are entangled rather than additive. Researchers identify three causal mechanisms: common causes that stress several systems at once, domino effects that carry a shock from one system to the next, and feedbacks between systems that amplify both24. The 2026 evidence shows all three. Warming at 1.43 °C in 2025, after a record 1.55 °C in 2024, is a common cause across water, food, health and nature1. Natural-disaster losses of US$224 billion in 2025, half of them uninsured, move through household balance sheets and public budgets2, where 3.4 billion people already live in countries that spend more on interest than on health or education13. About 673 million people faced hunger in 20247 and 123.2 million were forcibly displaced12. Six of nine planetary boundaries are transgressed20. This Baseline Edition maps the mechanisms, fixes the reference state, and sets the questions the 2027 edition will test. It forecasts no collapse and ranks no threat.

S.2Key messages

Six readings that frame the global baseline, and the eight questions this edition answers, each with its status and source.

  1. 1.43 °C above 1850–1900 in 2025, after a record 1.55 °C in 2024; 2023–2025 averaged 1.48 °C.140

    How warm is the world?Reported

  2. Insured losses exceeded US$100 billion for the sixth year running; 2025 losses were driven by floods, storms and wildfires.2

    Are disaster losses rising?Reported

  3. Half of 2025 losses were uninsured; in Asia almost nine-tenths were.2

    Who carries the losses?Reported

  4. No: energy CO₂ set a record in 2024, although clean power supplied about 41% of electricity.46

    Are emissions falling?Reported

  5. 673 million people faced hunger in 2024; concurrent breadbasket failure is a rising tail risk.723

    Is the food system stable?Reported

  6. Wildlife populations fell by 73% on average from 1970 to 2020; six of nine planetary boundaries are transgressed.920

    How fast is nature changing?Reported

  7. Debt service: 3.4 billion people live where interest outweighs health or education spending.13

    What constrains the response?Reported

  8. A concurrent breadbasket shortfall coinciding with an energy and fertiliser price shock. SCN-SR01-BBF-01

    What will 2027 test first?Expert input

S.3Headline finding

ReportedEQL 4NRF-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE-FIN-003

Insurers covered about 48% of the US$224 billion in natural-disaster losses in 2025, about 70% in North America, about half in Europe, about 12% in Asia and under a fifth in Africa.

Figure S.1Natural-disaster losses in 2025 (US$ billion)
ItemBar, scaled to the largest valueValue
Insured108
Uninsured116

Source: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE 20252; the uninsured share is the difference between overall and insured losses.

The protection gap is widest where exposure is growing fastest and fiscal space is thinnest. Uninsured losses become household debt, delayed reconstruction and pressure on public budgets, which feed back into vulnerability before the next event21318.

S.4At a glance

8.2billion

people, 202411

1.55°C

record year, 202441

423.9ppm

CO₂ concentration, 20241

57.1Gt CO₂e

GHG emissions, 20233

123.2million

forcibly displaced, end-202412

102US$ tn

public debt, 202413

S.5What each steward reads in it

GCRI · KEY T

Technical Truth

The evidence supports an entangled reading of global risk.

GRF · KEY M

Public Meaning

For most people global risk arrives as a price rise, a heat wave or a flood, and its burden depends on where they live.

GRA · KEY F

Capital Meaning

Readiness implications only. About half of disaster losses are uninsured, debt service crowds out adaptation, and climate disclosure standards are spreading.

NEXUS

Synthesis

The world’s crises share causes and channels.

S.6What this edition is, and is not

What this edition is

A question-led baseline: how crises in climate, food, energy, finance, health and conflict become entangled through common causes, domino effects and feedbacks. It reads the same global evidence as the global edition, through the mechanisms that connect it.

What it is not

Not a list of crises, a prediction of collapse, a ranking of threats or countries, or a policy recommendation. It states where the scientific community disagrees before stating what this edition concludes.

What comes next

National, regional and sector evidence binds each mechanism in 2027. Each edition reports what changed against this baseline, new observations, source revisions, method changes, scenario updates and corrections.

Notes

Numbers are the edition’s reference numbers, so a note reads the same in every chapter. The full list, with every source and its licence, is in Annex C. Annex C, references

  1. 24M. Lawrence, T. Homer-Dixon, S. Janzwood, J. Rockström, O. Renn and J. F. Donges, “Global polycrisis: the causal mechanisms of crisis entanglement,” Global Sustainability, vol. 7, e6, 2024.back
  2. 1WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2025, WMO-No. 1391. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, March 2026.back
  3. 2Munich Re (ed.), Natural disasters in 2025: NatCatSERVICE full-year figures. Munich Re, Munich, January 2026.back
  4. 13UNCTAD (ed.), A World of Debt 2025: It Is Time for Reform. UNCTAD, Geneva, 2025.back
  5. 7FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO (eds.), The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025. FAO, Rome, 2025.back
  6. 12UNHCR (ed.), Global Trends: Forced Displacement in 2024. UNHCR, Copenhagen, June 2025.back
  7. 20K. Richardson, W. Steffen, W. Lucht et al., “Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries,” Science Advances, vol. 9, eadh2458, 2023.back
  8. 40WMO (ed.), “WMO confirms 2025 was one of warmest years on record.” Press release. WMO, Geneva, January 2026.back
  9. 4International Energy Agency (ed.), Global Energy Review 2025. IEA, Paris, 2025.back
  10. 6Ember (ed.), Global Electricity Review 2025. Ember, London, 2025.back
  11. 23F. Gaupp, J. Hall, S. Hochrainer-Stigler and S. Dadson, “Changing risks of simultaneous global breadbasket failure,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 10, pp. 54–57, 2020.back
  12. 9WWF (ed.), Living Planet Report 2024: A System in Peril. WWF, Gland, 2024.back
  13. 18UNDRR (ed.), Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction 2025: Resilience Pays. UNDRR, Geneva, 2025.back
  14. 11UN DESA Population Division (ed.), World Population Prospects 2024: Summary of Results. United Nations, New York, 2024.back
  15. 41WMO (ed.), State of the Global Climate 2024, WMO-No. 1368. WMO, Geneva, 2025.back
  16. 3UNEP (ed.), Emissions Gap Report 2024: No more hot air … please! UNEP, Nairobi, 2024.back

Cite this summary

Valadbaygi, S. (Ed.). (2026). Executive summary: Executive summary. In Strategic Systems Report 2026: Global Polycrisis and Cascading Systems Risk (Baseline Edition 2026, Report No. NR-STRATEGIC-POLYCRISIS-GLOBAL-2026-BASELINE) [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI).

Every citation form of the whole report, BibTeX and RIS included, is on the edition home. Cite this report

ReportsContribute

Send evidence or a correction on Global Polycrisis.

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks AllianceStrategic Systems
The Global Risks Alliance

Finance · trust · precision

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Support our work

Who funds us

GRA is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.