GRA · Institutional Funds Nexus
空间金融资本与危害、风险暴露和转型的交汇之处
受托治理
Fiduciary duty asks the people who control a fund to act prudently and in the interest of its members or beneficiaries, not their own or the sponsor’s. In practice the duty is carried through boards, investment committees, consultants, managers and custodians, each with its own incentives. This page sets out how governance strengths and failures develop along that chain, how they are evidenced in public records, and what the evidence serves for the boards, appointing bodies and supervisors who hold accountability.
Fiduciary governance in seven parts.
Fiduciary governance: how the risk develops.
Mandates, controls and accountability. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Delegation lengthens the chain
Trustees delegate to executives, consultants and external managers, who delegate further to sub-advisers and service providers. Each link adds cost and distance from members, and accountability weakens unless mandates, reporting and oversight are explicit.
Capacity lags complexity
Portfolios now include derivatives, private markets and sustainability obligations, while many boards meet a few times a year with part-time members. When skill and time fall behind complexity, boards rely on advice they cannot fully test.
Conflicts shape decisions
Sponsor-appointed trustees, political appointments in public funds, fee arrangements and adviser incentives can pull decisions away from members’ interests. Conflicts are managed by disclosure, independence and recusal, and fail quietly when those are missing.
Outcomes arrive late
The consequences of a governance decision on funding or returns may appear years after the board that made it has changed. Long feedback loops weaken learning and let short-term measures crowd out long-term objectives.
People and hazards in Oceania and the Pacific.
Population density, night lights and flood water over Oceania and the Pacific, from NASA GIBS. Each layer carries its own date.
交互式地图需要JavaScript；图层列表和来源见下文。
图层 3
本页面的人口与危害
关于此图层
- 证据
- 估计值
- 来源
- 世界网格化人口 v4.11（NASA SEDAC（哥伦比亚大学 CIESIN））
- 提供方
- NASA SEDAC（CIESIN，哥伦比亚大学）
- 许可协议
- CC BY 4.0
- 年份版本
- null；基于人口普查的估算，静态（2020）
- 分辨率
- 约 1 公里网格
- 不确定性
- 基于普查的 2020 年每平方公里人口估算，作为风险暴露背景展示；不是受任何危害影响的人口数。
- 可通过以下方式到达
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov，仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问
关于此图层
- 证据
- 观测
- 来源
- VIIRS 黑色大理石（VNP46A2）（NASA LAADS DAAC）
- 提供方
- NASA LAADS DAAC
- 许可协议
- NASA 开放数据
- 年份版本
- 每日；卫星辐亮度，已校正月光和大气影响
- 构建时的最新内容
- 2026-10-12
- 分辨率
- 约 500 米网格
- 不确定性
- 所示日期的卫星夜间辐亮度；灯光是用电和停电情况的代理指标，不是对供应或可及性的测量。
- 可通过以下方式到达
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov，仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问
关于此图层
- 证据
- 观测（云层造成缺口）
- 来源
- VIIRS 全球洪水产品（NASA LANCE）
- 提供方
- NASA LANCE
- 许可协议
- NASA 开放数据
- 年份版本
- 每日；卫星探测；云层造成缺口
- 构建时的最新内容
- 2026-10-14
- 分辨率
- 约 250 米网格
- 不确定性
- 卫星探测；云层造成缺口。按提供方发布的原样提供的卫星或模型栅格数据。云层、扫描带缺口和反演误差会造成缺口和噪声；这些数值是指标，不是某一地点的测量值。
- 可通过以下方式到达
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov，仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问
关于此图层
- 证据
- 观测（持续云层仍会造成缺口）
- 来源
- VIIRS NOAA-20 3 级产品，8 日（NASA LANCE）
- 提供方
- NASA LANCE
- 许可协议
- NASA 开放数据
- 年份版本
- 8 日；卫星 8 日合成；持续云层仍会造成缺口
- 构建时的最新内容
- 2026-09-14
- 分辨率
- 约 1 公里网格
- 不确定性
- 截至所示日期的 8 天内地表的卫星表面温度，是一项热风险暴露指标；不是气温、热指数或高温预警。
- 可通过以下方式到达
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov，仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问
关于此图层
- 证据
- 观测
- 来源
- VIIRS NOAA-20 校正反射率（NASA LANCE）
- 提供方
- NASA LANCE
- 许可协议
- NASA 开放数据
- 年份版本
- 每日；卫星图像
- 构建时的最新内容
- 2026-10-14
- 分辨率
- 约 250 米网格
- 不确定性
- 卫星图像。卫星或模型栅格数据，按提供方发布的原样呈现。云层、条带缺口和反演误差会造成缺口和噪声；数值是指标，而非某地的测量值。
- 可通过以下方式到达
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov，仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问
关于此图层
- 证据
- 模型生成（GIBS 发布的最新年份）
- 来源
- MODIS Terra 和 Aqua 土地覆盖（MCD12Q1）（NASA LP DAAC）
- 提供方
- NASA LP DAAC
- 许可协议
- NASA 开放数据
- 年份版本
- 每年；卫星分类；GIBS 发布的最新年份
- 构建时的最新内容
- 2024-01-01
- 分辨率
- 约 500 米网格
- 不确定性
- 所示年份的卫星土地覆盖类别，含农田；该分类存在已知误差，并非农场登记册。
- 可通过以下方式到达
- gibs.earthdata.nasa.gov，仅在您允许加载实时地图后访问
键盘操作，地图获得焦点时
按住 Ctrl 或 ⌘ 并滚动以缩放
最新可用
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap贡献者 (ODbL) · Natural Earth
正在加载最新的NASA影像。
拖动以移动。按住 Ctrl 或 ⌘ 并滚动、双指缩放或使用按钮缩放；悬停可查看指针下的数值；重置可返回该区域。
People and hazards, framed on Oceania and the Pacific.NASA 发布的卫星和模型产品，各带自己的日期。它们是指标，而非对任何地点的评估。
数据：NASA GIBS · ASTER GDEM · Blue Marble · © OpenStreetMap 贡献者 · Natural Earth · NASA EONET · CIESIN/Columbia, NASA SEDAC HBASE · 美国地质调查局来源与许可
- We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA 开放数据
- We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS). Colours redrawn from the published colour map; values averaged into hexagonal cells where shown (modified). NASA 开放数据
- Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN), Columbia University. 2018. Gridded Population of the World, Version 4 (GPWv4): Population Density, Revision 11. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). 采用 CC BY 4.0 许可。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘；显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均（经修改）。 doi:10.7927/H49C6VHW. CC BY 4.0
- VIIRS Black Marble 夜间灯光，NASA 戈达德航天中心；由 NASA Level-1 与大气档案和分发系统（LAADS DAAC）分发；影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘；显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均（经修改）。 NASA 开放数据
- VIIRS 近实时产品（洪水、地表温度、积雪覆盖、校正反射率），NASA LANCE；影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘；显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均（经修改）。 NASA 开放数据
- MODIS 陆地产品（植被指数、总初级生产力、土地覆盖），NASA LP DAAC 和 LANCE；影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘；显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均（经修改）。 NASA 开放数据
- ASTER GDEM 是 METI 和 NASA 的产品（ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003，NASA LP DAAC）；影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘；显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均（经修改）。引用格式：NASA/METI/AIST/Japan Spacesystems and U.S./Japan ASTER Science Team (2019). ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model V003. doi:10.5067/ASTER/ASTGTM.003. NASA 开放数据
- 使用 Natural Earth 制作。免费矢量和栅格地图数据，见 naturalearthdata.com。 公有领域
- © OpenStreetMap 贡献者（ODbL），经由 NASA GIBS（海岸线、边界、道路和地名）。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘；显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均（经修改）。 ODbL
- Blue Marble，NASA Earth Observatory；影像来自 NASA GIBS。颜色依据已发布的色标重绘；显示处的数值已按六边形网格平均（经修改）。 NASA 开放数据
- 地球仪和平面地图上的背景信息：海岸线、边界、道路和地名来自 NASA GIBS 参考图层（OpenStreetMap 数据，ODbL，© OpenStreetMap contributors）；Blue Marble 影像可作为可选底图；3D 地形和高程读数来自 ASTER GDEM 高程色彩指数（5 m 至 200 m 分级，为便于辨识而作了夸张处理）。边界按已发布的样式绘制，不代表对任何领土的立场。
- 实时事件：NASA Earth Observatory Natural Event Tracker（EONET）；事件仅供参考，并保留其原始来源链接。
- 实时：NASA EONET。事件仅供参考，不是主管机构的预警。
- 背景：CIESIN/Columbia, NASA SEDAC HBASE。哥伦比亚大学国际地球科学信息网络中心（CIESIN）和 NASA 社会经济数据与应用中心（SEDAC）：Global Human Built-up And Settlement Extent (HBASE) 2010；Seto, Guneralp and Hutyra 2012, Global Grid of Probabilities of Urban Expansion to 2030；Global Urban Heat Island (UHI) Data Set, 2013。
- 实时：美国地质调查局。事件仅供参考，不是主管机构的预警。
- NASA GIBS: We acknowledge the use of imagery provided by services from NASA’s Global Imagery Browse Services (GIBS), part of NASA’s Earth Science Data and Information System (ESDIS).
- 可选图层（图层列表中有 5 个来源：实时、预报、观测和背景）在打开时会在地图上和此处显示其提供方署名；预报为模型输出，派生指数为估计值。
图层与日期
- 人口密度，2020 年：人口：哥伦比亚大学 CIESIN，世界网格化人口 v4.11（2018），NASA SEDAC， CC BY 4.0 · 静态
- 夜间灯光，每日：VIIRS Black Marble（VNP46A2），NASA LAADS DAAC · 2026年10月12日
- 洪水水体，3 日合成：VIIRS 全球洪水产品，NASA LANCE · 2026年10月14日
- 地表温度，日间，8 天合成：VIIRS NOAA-20 3 级产品，8 天，NASA LANCE · 2026年9月14日
- 真彩色：VIIRS NOAA-20 校正反射率，NASA LANCE · 2026年10月13日
- 土地覆盖类型（IGBP），年度：MODIS Terra 和 Aqua 土地覆盖（MCD12Q1），NASA LP DAAC · 2024
衡量什么，以及衡量得如何。
每个指标都注明其单位、频率、背后的来源类型以及数值将附带的证据标签。此处不显示数值：数值由计划依据其自身权限提供。
| 指标 | 单位 | 节奏 | 来源类型 | 标签 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent members on the governing board | percent of board seats | 年度 | Governance statements and annual reports | 已声明 |
| Trustee knowledge and training | hours per board member per year | 年度 | Governance statements | 已声明 |
| Total investment cost | basis points of average assets | 年度 | Cost disclosures and benchmarking surveys | 已报告 |
| Conflicts of interest declared and managed | count of register entries per year | 年度 | Conflicts registers and board minutes | 已声明 |
| Time since last review of the investment policy statement | 月 | 年度 | Statements of investment principles | 已声明 |
| Santiago Principles addressed in self-assessment | principles addressed against principles applicable | per self-assessment | IFSWF self-assessments | 已声明 |
| Supervisory findings on governance | 每年计数 | 年度 | Regulator enforcement and supervision reports | 已发布统计 |
资产负债控制台。
团队跟踪该主题时会使用的界面：其指标、状态与决策。名称为示例，数值仅作示意。
资产负债控制台
Fiduciary governance · Pension fund P · Valuation date Q3
- 资金比率，占负债的 %1020正常
- 风险盈余，1/207占负债的 %关注
- 利率对冲75占负债的 %
- 抵押品覆盖率1.6×正常
资金充足率预测
抵押品瀑布
| 1 | 现金与英国国债 | 220 | 0 |
| 2 | Index-linked | 515 | 1 |
| 3 | 信贷 | 405 | 5 |
| 4 | 非流动 | 609 | 超过 30 |
证据来自何处。
具名公共数据集与机构记录，各自注明许可类别。依协议获得的来源仅按其条款使用，绝不再次发布。
| 来源 | 它提供什么 | 许可类别 |
|---|---|---|
| OECD Guidelines for Pension Fund Governance and related surveys | Governance structures, accountability and suitability requirements across OECD jurisdictions | 免费再利用，须署名 |
| IOPS working papers and supervisory guidelines | Supervisory practice on governance, internal controls and risk management | Free to read, IOPS terms |
| IFSWF Santiago Principles self-assessments | Members’ own accounts of legal basis, governance, investment and accountability | Free to read, IFSWF terms |
| The Pensions Regulator governance surveys and enforcement reports | Governance practice and regulatory action across UK occupational schemes | 开放政府许可 |
| US Department of Labor Form 5500 data sets | Annual returns of private employee benefit plans, including service providers and fees | 公有领域 |
| National audit office reports on public pension and sovereign funds | Independent examinations of governance, controls and performance | 公共记录，条款因办公室而异 |
| Annual reports and governance statements of funds | Board composition, committee structures, costs and policies | Public records, terms per fund |
政策路径及其对风险的影响。
How three families of instruments change a risk outcome over time with adoption lags, coverage and compliance, the policy scenarios behind transition and physical risk assessments. Scenario: named assumptions about the future, not a forecast. The map on this page shows Oceania and the Pacific; the model itself is not tied to a place.
控制措施
- 结果的基线趋势
- 每年 2.0%
- 该工具的覆盖范围
- 70%
- 合规
- 75%
- 效应量，相对于教学取值
- 100%
- 未来年数
- 20 年
读数
- 期末时点降幅最大
- 监管
- 相对基线的降幅
- 21%
数字、方法与来源
| 年份 | 基线 | 监管 | 经济激励 | 信息与能力 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 100.0 | 99.5 | 98.8 | 99.1 |
| 1 | 102.0 | 101.2 | 100.1 | 99.8 |
| 2 | 104.0 | 102.5 | 101.1 | 99.9 |
| 3 | 106.1 | 103.5 | 101.6 | 100.0 |
| 4 | 108.2 | 103.7 | 101.8 | 100.7 |
| 5 | 110.4 | 103.2 | 101.7 | 102.1 |
| 6 | 112.6 | 102.0 | 101.6 | 103.9 |
| 7 | 114.9 | 100.4 | 101.6 | 105.9 |
| 8 | 117.2 | 99.2 | 102.1 | 108.0 |
| 9 | 119.5 | 98.6 | 102.9 | 110.1 |
| 10 | 121.9 | 98.9 | 104.2 | 112.3 |
| 11 | 124.3 | 99.7 | 105.7 | 114.5 |
| 12 | 126.8 | 101.1 | 107.4 | 116.8 |
| 13 | 129.4 | 102.7 | 109.4 | 119.2 |
| 14 | 131.9 | 104.5 | 111.4 | 121.6 |
| 15 | 134.6 | 106.5 | 113.5 | 124.0 |
| 16 | 137.3 | 108.5 | 115.7 | 126.5 |
| 17 | 140.0 | 110.7 | 118.0 | 129.0 |
| 18 | 142.8 | 112.9 | 120.4 | 131.6 |
| 19 | 145.7 | 115.1 | 122.8 | 134.2 |
| 20 | 148.6 | 117.4 | 125.2 | 136.9 |
方法
- 政府工具 Hood (1983), The Tools of Government, Macmillan
- 胡萝卜、大棒与说教 Bemelmans-Videc, Rist and Vedung (1998), Transaction
- 创新扩散 Rogers (2003), Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press
- 不确定性扇形图（参数蒙特卡罗） Spiegelhalter, Pearson and Short (2011), Visualising uncertainty about the future, Science 333
- 单因素敏感性（龙卷风图） Saltelli and others (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Wiley
数据
The model runs on the teaching values set by the controls. To calibrate it for a place, read it against these admitted layers and series, which this page’s map can draw:
- 边界 Natural Earth
- 城市 Natural Earth
贯穿六大支柱，由 Nexus Consortium 牵头
由谁决定，以及证据服务于什么。
Institutional Funds Nexus prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| 谁来决定 | 问题 | 本页面服务的证据 |
|---|---|---|
| Boards of trustees and fund governing boards | How to structure delegation, oversee managers and manage conflicts | Delegation maps, cost disclosures, conflict registers and comparable governance practice |
| Appointing bodies: sponsors, governments and member nomination processes | Who sits on the board and what skills and independence the board needs | Board composition and skill evidence against the fund’s complexity |
| Pension regulators and supervisory authorities | Whether governance and internal controls meet the code, and when to intervene | Governance statements, supervisory findings and comparable practice |
| 立法机构 | What governance and accountability law to set for public pension and sovereign funds | Comparative governance frameworks and documented failures and remedies |
该主题产生的产出
- Governance maps tracing delegation from members to managers and back
- Guides to fiduciary standards across ERISA, IORP II, UK codes and the Santiago Principles
- Research notes on board capacity, costs and conflicts drawn from public governance disclosures
- Question sets boards can use to test the advice they receive
Trace a shock in fiduciary governance to the balance sheet.
Assembled from the Nexus Standards area profile 资产所有者与资产管理: the shocks it names, the 系统 and sectors that carry the loss, the controls that dampen it and the data that observe it. Pick an initiating shock and step through the cascade to see which exposures it reaches and where losses could concentrate. The Map view places the run on an example geography with open data. Every weight is a stated assumption. An exercise, not a forecast, a valuation, a rating or investment advice. To model a place of your own choosing, open the full System Builder.
灾害
- Windstorm
- Geomagnetic storm
- 溃坝
- 大范围停电（在下游引发）
- 大规模森林干扰（在下游引发）
- 野火 （在下游引发）
- Geomagnetically induced current (set off downstream)
- Ionospheric disturbance (set off downstream)
- Satellite space-environment anomaly (set off downstream)
- 河流洪水（在下游引发）
- Flash flood (set off downstream)
- 大规模流离失所（在下游引发）
- Shoreline ice shove (set off downstream)
- Thermospheric drag surge (set off downstream)
- Radiation-belt electron enhancement (set off downstream)
- Seiche (set off downstream)
- Satellite-navigation disruption (set off downstream)
- Uncontrolled re-entry (set off downstream)
系统与耦合
- 资产所有者与资产管理
- 银行业 耦合
- 能源公用事业与电网 耦合
- 中央银行与金融监管机构 耦合
- 采矿与采掘业 耦合
控制措施
NS-0章程与原则NS-3风险记录 UNI（语法、旧编码对照、分配机构）NS-9情境 UNI（部署、实例、计划实例）NS-11验证与监测（证据、证明、零信任符合性观测）NS-14符合性及与外部标准的对照NRS-U1宇宙 platform profile: Asset Management NexusNRS-H113危害类别：金融体系脆弱性（NHS-1 soc.financial-system）NRS-N6基础设施风险与韧性NRS-C3危害、风险暴露、脆弱性与能力数据NRS-M3方法体系：风险暴露与资产情报NRS-N5生物多样性与自然风险及韧性
观测
- OECD Data Explorer (incl. Creditor Reporting System, insurance and pension statistics) (listed for reference)
- NGFS Scenario Explorer（仅列作参考）
- GLEIF Golden Copy (LEI Level 1 and Level 2 data) (listed for reference)
- World Development Indicators (listed for reference)
- Number of companies publishing sustainability reports
- Market capitalisation of listed domestic companies (% of GDP)
- Total greenhouse gas emissions per year
示例地理范围
- 西欧：152 个六边形网格
- 过去半小时降雨率（IMERG），NASA GIBS
- 今夜夜间灯光与停电（VIIRS 昼夜波段），NASA GIBS
- Vegetation disturbance alerts, 30 m (OPERA DIST-ALERT), NASA GIBS
- Carbon monoxide, smoke transport (AIRS), NASA GIBS
专家提出的问题。
Governance questions ask whether the right people decide well.
- What duties do trustees and boards owe, to whom, and how are they interpreted?
- Do boards have the expertise and information to oversee complex risks?
- How are decisions delegated to staff, managers and advisers, and how is delegation monitored?
- How are conflicts of interest identified and managed?
- How are long-term and systemic risks incorporated into fiduciary decisions?
What fiduciary governance means for exposure, loss and capital.
风险官、监管者或财政部会要求的风险暴露、损失、情景和资本视图，以及它们据以报告的框架。结构遵循监管和精算实务。数值为说明性：绝非价格、评级或建议。
传导渠道
How a shock in fiduciary governance reaches credit, market, underwriting, liquidity and operational risk, and feeds back.
机制与驱动因素。
Fiduciaries must act prudently and in the interests of beneficiaries. As portfolios and risks grow more complex, boards depend increasingly on delegated experts, which creates agency risks and requires strong oversight. Board composition, training, time and access to independent advice influence decision quality.
Long horizons create tension with short-term performance measurement, and interpretations of fiduciary duty regarding long-term and systemic risks continue to evolve through law, regulation and practice. Clear mandates, documented decisions and regular review support accountability.
如何研究，以及方法止于何处。
| 方法或数据 | 显示内容 | 局限 |
|---|---|---|
| Comparative governance analysis | How governance structures differ | Structures do not show behaviour |
| Board effectiveness reviews | Expertise, processes and dynamics | Often confidential and self-reported |
| Legal analysis of fiduciary duty | How duties are interpreted | Varies by jurisdiction and changes over time |
| Empirical studies of governance and outcomes | Links between governance and performance | Causality is difficult to establish |
如何研究，以及方法无法说明的内容。
- 01不确定性下的决策分析Risk appetite and journey planning · Robust strategic allocation在此应用
- 02金融经济学与宏观金融Capital market assumptions · Collateral and market feedback在此应用
- 03精算数学Liability valuation on several bases · Mortality and longevity projection在此应用
- 04情景设计与压力测试Supervisory pension stress test · Reverse stress test of funding在此应用
问题与解答。
What does fiduciary duty require?
Does delegation transfer the duty?
Why are costs a governance indicator?
What does prudence mean for a fiduciary?
Can fiduciaries consider long-term systemic risks?
Why does delegation need oversight?
Does the platform give legal advice on fiduciary duty?
从本页贡献证据。
报告 is the Consortium’s quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- 电子邮件门户 GW-GRA从本页发送证据、更正、案例、方法、审查、翻译或概况投稿。它会带上本页标签送达，由负责的编辑接收。
- Zenodo开放存缴存缴并提交到社区用您的 ORCID iD 在 Zenodo 上发布您自己的记录，然后提交到那里的 Reports 社区。由策展人审核；DOI 仍归您所有。
- 报告全球风险联盟（Global Risks Alliance）查看所有贡献方式贡献类型、各自的评审方式、您获得的署名、许可协议，以及绝不接受的内容。
切勿发送个人数据、敏感基础设施细节或您无权分享的任何内容。贡献在使用前会经过审查；发送贡献不赋予署名权或编辑权，赞助也绝不能换取研究结论。
法律文件。
本网站上的地图、数据和图表仅作为背景和一般信息展示。它们不是建议、预测或预警；信息的局限见免责声明和数据说明。