Skip to content

GRA · Fintech Nexus

Spatial financeWhere capital meets hazard, exposure and transition

Publish in Reports

Fintech Nexus contributes sector evidence to Reports, published by the Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), mainly in the Exponential Technology and the Finance and Insurance Readiness series. Contributions concern dependencies, outages, digital money and automated models, and none evaluates a named firm, product or token.

01Register

Publish in Reports on the record.

Fintech Nexus
  1. 01FieldsCapital markets and investment, Cyber and digital resilience, Digital public infrastructure
  2. 02STEM methods5 canonical methods applied
  3. 03Topics9 subject pages
  4. 04Counterparts4 platforms in shared fields
  5. 05PublisherThe Global Risks Alliance
02Six pillars

Reports among the six pillars.

Where all outputs are published, in all formats, across its five sites, each with sources, limits and corrections. It is led by the Nexus Consortium; its home is therisk.global/nexus-reports.

Select pillars · hover lines16 / 18 handoffs

Route

Around Reports

The pillars Reports hands work to and receives it from.

L · F · U · S · R · A

Pillars
5 of 6
Handoffs
16 of 18
Loops
16 closed

Handoffs in play

  • F01Universe → Foundry · Admitted mission becomes a cycle project with a decision caseReadiness preparation
  • F02Foundry → Universe · Core Build Report and go or no-go evidenceControlled build
  • F03Foundry → Reports · Sealed observations and indicator series behind a profileCloseout
  • F04Universe → Reports · After-action and scenario findings for chapters 10 and 13After-action review

and 12 more

F01 to F14 are the recorded handoffs of the programme year, each with the artefact that moves and its phase; R1, R2, R3 and R4 carry work around the ring. A loop counts when every pillar on it is selected. Every pillar is led by the Nexus Consortium.
  1. LabsWhere questions become experiments and prototypes: new methods, data and tools are tried in the open, with their limits on record, before the Foundry builds them, under the Nexus Consortium.Labs
  2. FoundryWhere exposure and scenario evidence is built so supervisors, insurers and investors can read it.Fintech Nexus in FoundryFoundry
  3. UniverseWhere scenarios are tested in controlled exercises, and finance-readiness dialogues read what they mean for capital and cover.Fintech Nexus in Universeuniverse.nexus
  4. Nexus StandardsWhere disclosure and data rules are codified so risk evidence is comparable for finance and insurance.Finance, Insurance and the Economy in Standardsnexustandards.com
  5. ReportsWhere sector analysis and the finance and insurance readiness series are published, with exposure and limits stated.Fintech Nexus in ReportsReports
  6. Risk AcademyWhere finance, insurance and public-finance professionals learn to read risk evidence, on Risk Academy.Faculty of Finance and Economics in Academyrisksacademy.com

Reports in every area of the work

AreaReports
LeadershipSeries editors lead each edition under the series method; no funder, sponsor or member can buy or block a finding.
StrategyEach country programme agrees the scope of its profile before Q1, and nothing outside that scope is published.
CadenceQuarterly: Q1 State and Agenda, Q2 Evidence and Build, Q3 Stress Test and Readiness, and the Q4 Annual Synthesis as the flagship; an edition is published after review, not to a calendar.
OwnershipOwns editions and their evidence cutoff, country and regional profiles, technology stream briefs and the correction history.
ProcessContribution, editorial review, publication with version history, then challenge and correction as a new version.
DevelopmentDevelops country profiles each quarter, regional profiles twice a year and one exponential technology stream at a time.
SimulationsPublishes scenario findings labelled as modelled, with their uncertainty.
ReportingPublishes every output in every format across its five sites, each edition with sources, limits and corrections.
GovernancePublication is not authority: an edition is never a government risk register or a sovereign rating, and countries are never ranked.
Data and evidenceObserved, modelled and estimated evidence stay apart, and each edition states its evidence cutoff.
Finance and resourcingThe Finance and Insurance Readiness and the Portfolio and Readiness series make the evidence readable to finance.
Risk and assuranceEach finding states its method, uncertainty and limits, and reproducible concerns go to the owner of the finding.
ParticipationResearchers and practitioners contribute reviewed findings, and any reader can challenge a finding.
CommunicationEvery output is published in accessible formats with its version history.
LocalLocal evidence enters a profile only within the scope its country agreed.
NationalCountry profiles are updated each quarter, within the scope each country agreed before Q1.
RegionalRegional profiles are published twice a year, in Q2 and Q4, and never override a country's own findings.
PlanetaryThe Q4 Annual Synthesis reads country, regional and technology work together, without ranking countries.

What each institution brings

PillarGCRIGRFGRA
ReportsHosts the canonical Reports site and publishes evidence on countries, sectors and methods.Publishes governance analysis and authorises publication of the year's results at gate G6.Publishes sector analysis and the finance and insurance readiness series.
04Process

How the process runs.

Process explorer · Process

Publish in Reports: Programme through eight gates

11 steps4 stages8 gates

Process

Publish in Reports: Programme through eight gates

The Global Risks Forum (GRF) records eight yearly gates, each a programme decision; a gate not passed stops its work, and the competent authority decides outside.

  1. 01 Q1 · Planning

    1. 01G0 · Annual programme authorisedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF authorises the annual mandate. It never sets a national agenda.
    2. 03Route the candidate mission to standardsStep · Nexus StandardsNexus Standards routes each candidate mission to the standards and profiles that apply.
  2. 02 Q2 · Readiness and build

    1. 04G1 · Missions admittedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF admits missions with reasons recorded. It cannot admit a mission without an accountable owner.
    2. 05G2 · Data and resources qualifiedGate · The Global Risks ForumReadiness preparation closes when data, people and resources are qualified.
    3. 06G3 · Build accepted for exerciseGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF records whether the build is accepted for exercise. A gate not passed stops the work it governs.
  3. 03 Q3 · Action Week

    1. 07G4 · Controlled live operation authorisedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF authorises controlled live operation for Action Week.
    2. 08G5 · Evidence sealed and stand-down recordedGate · The Global Risks ForumThe evidence is sealed with its provenance and the stand-down is recorded.
  4. 04 Q4 · Reporting and renewal

    1. 02Competent authority decides and actsActor · The competent authorityThe competent authority decides and acts under its own rules. The programme informs it and never decides for it.
    2. 09Scientific and editorial reviewStep · Reviewers and the publisherQualified, conflict-managed reviewers and the publisher decide what is accepted. Institutions cannot decide a scientific conclusion.
    3. 10G6 · Publication authorisedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF authorises publication of results that have passed scientific and editorial review. It cannot publish personal data.
    4. 11G7 · Renewal reviewedGate · The Global Risks ForumGRF reviews renewal and sets the next cycle's mandate.

The programme year · The Global Risks Forum · Decision rightsDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation.

05Standards link

Alignment with the Nexus Standards.

Contributions carry resolvable identifiers and a crosswalk to the external frameworks they touch, such as DORA, the FSB third-party toolkit and FATF Recommendation 16, following the proposed Nexus Standards. Conformance is described without certification. Enquiries: Reports.

06Where this field publishes

Where this field publishes.

  1. 01
  2. 02
07Review

From finding to edition.

  1. 01

    Contribution

    A reviewed finding with its method, evidence labels and limits.

  2. 02

    Editorial review

    Series editors check scope, method and consistency.

  3. 03

    Publication

    The edition is published with its version history.

  4. 04

    Correction

    Challenges are answered and corrections published as new versions.

08Sources

Where this page's references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

09Questions

Questions and answers.

Who decides what is published?
The series editors, following the series method. No funder, sponsor or member can buy or block a finding.
ReportsContribute

Contribute evidence from this page.

Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.

Global Risks AllianceFintech NexusExponential TechnologyFinance and Insurance Readiness
Fintech Nexus

Bring an exposure or capital question to the Alliance.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.