GRA · Financial Regulation Nexus
Spatial financeWhere capital meets hazard, exposure and transition
Market conduct and consumer protection
Conduct regulation governs how financial firms design, sell and service products and how they behave in markets. Customers face complex products, unequal information and predictable behavioural biases; markets depend on fair dealing and price integrity. This page explains how conduct failures develop from product design to mis-selling and market abuse, how they spread across firms, which measures securities and consumer protection authorities use, and what the evidence can and cannot show.
Market conduct and consumer protection in seven parts.
- 01The questionMarket conduct and consumer protection: how the risk develops
- 02IndicatorsWhat is measured, and how well
- 03SourcesWhere the evidence comes from
- 04DecisionsWho decides, and what the evidence serves
- 05Core questionsWhat experts ask
- 06Mechanisms and driversInformation gaps and incentives
- 07Methods and dataHow the evidence is built, and where it stops
Market conduct and consumer protection: how the risk develops.
Disclosure, fairness and protection. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Disclosure without understanding
Long or complex disclosure meets the letter of the rule while customers still cannot compare price, risk or terms. Present bias, inertia and overconfidence let poor-value products persist even in markets with many competitors.
Incentives shape selling
Commissions, sales targets and conflicted advice push products to customers they do not fit. Product governance and suitability rules act at the design and distribution stages, before harm shows up as complaints.
Harm scales across firms
A profitable practice spreads as competitors copy it, so mis-selling is often industry-wide. When it surfaces, redress, litigation and lost trust land together, and large remediation can carry prudential consequences.
Abuse erodes market integrity
Insider dealing, manipulation and front-running distort prices and deter participation. Fragmented venues and fast trading make surveillance depend on complete, timely transaction and order reporting.
Supervisory review console.
The screen a team would use to follow this subject: its measures, states and decisions. Names are examples and values are illustrative.
Supervisory review console
Market conduct and consumer protection · Bank supervision · Cycle 1
Firms by risk rating
| Bank B | High | 3 | 7 | Enhanced |
| Bank D | Medium | 2 | 1 | Standard |
| Insurer Alpha | High | 3 | 4 | Enhanced |
| Fintech F1 | Low | 2 | 2 | Light |
Findings
Climate expectations met
share of firms, thematic review
What is measured, and how well.
Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.
| Indicator | Unit | Cadence | Source type | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer complaints by product | count per product per period | quarterly | Regulator and ombudsman complaint data | REPORTED |
| Complaints upheld by an ombudsman | percent of decided complaints upheld | semi-annual | Ombudsman publications | Published statistics |
| Conduct enforcement actions | count of final notices, orders and settlements | annual | Regulator enforcement registers | Published statistics |
| Redress paid under remediation schemes | currency amount per scheme | per scheme | Regulator and firm disclosures | REPORTED |
| Suspicious transaction and order reports | count of reports received | annual | Market abuse reporting to regulators | Published statistics |
| Product intervention measures in force | count by product type and authority | annual | Product intervention notices | Published statistics |
| Consumer protection legal coverage | presence of specified protections by jurisdiction | per survey round | World Bank consumer protection survey | Published statistics |
| IOSCO principles observance | grade per principle | per FSAP | IMF and World Bank detailed assessment | Published statistics |
What market conduct and consumer protection means for exposure, loss and capital.
The exposure, loss, scenario and capital views a risk officer, supervisor or ministry of finance would ask for, with the frameworks they report against. Structures follow supervisory and actuarial practice. Values are illustrative: never prices, ratings or advice.
Disclosure crosswalk
Where evidence on market conduct and consumer protection fits the disclosure and prudential frameworks institutions report against.
| Pillar | TCFD | ISSB IFRS S2 | Prudential (BCBS, IAIS) | Evidence this page can hold |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Governance | Board oversight of climate-related risks | Governance requirements | Governance and risk appetite principles | Who owns the risk and how it is escalated |
| Strategy | Risks, opportunities and resilience | Scenario analysis and resilience | Strategy and business model principles | Scenario design and transmission paths |
| Risk management | Identify, assess, manage | Risk management processes | Internal control and ICAAP or ORSA | Exposure maps and loss views |
| Metrics and targets | Metrics used and targets set | Cross-industry and industry metrics | Data, metrics and reporting principles | Indicator definitions and units |
Where the evidence comes from.
Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.
| Source | What it gives | Licence class |
|---|---|---|
| CFPB Consumer Complaint Database | Complaints about consumer financial products and companies' responses, United States | Public domain, US government work |
| FCA Financial Services Register and complaints data | Authorisation status of firms and firm-level complaint returns, United Kingdom | Open Government Licence |
| ESMA sanctions register and product intervention notices | Sanctions under EU securities law and product intervention measures | Public, reuse with attribution |
| SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings | Enforcement actions under US securities law | Public domain, US government work |
| World Bank Global Financial Inclusion and Consumer Protection Survey | Cross-country records of consumer protection law, institutions and practice | Free and open, CC BY |
| IMF FSAP detailed assessments of the IOSCO Principles | Assessments of securities regulation, including conduct and market integrity | Public, IMF copyright and terms |
| Financial ombudsman published decisions | Decisions on individual complaints showing how fairness standards are applied | Public records, terms per scheme |
Who decides, and what the evidence serves.
Financial Regulation Nexus prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| Who decides | The question | Evidence this page serves |
|---|---|---|
| Securities and conduct regulators | Which products, practices and firms to prioritise for supervision and enforcement | Complaint trends by product, enforcement case histories, product intervention precedents |
| Consumer protection authorities and legislatures | Whether disclosure rules, cooling-off rights or product bans are needed | Comparative rules, behavioural evidence on disclosure, case histories of harm |
| Financial ombudsman schemes | How to apply fairness standards consistently across similar complaints | Published decisions and the rules and guidance they apply |
| Boards of financial firms | Whether products deliver fair value and whether incentives drive mis-selling | Product governance expectations, enforcement precedents, complaint root-cause practice |
Outputs this topic produces
- Comparative briefs on disclosure, suitability and product governance rules
- Case libraries of industry-wide mis-selling and how it was detected
- Complaint and enforcement data guides with definitions and breaks noted
- Supervisory learning material on market abuse surveillance
What experts ask.
Conduct researchers ask what makes financial markets fair in practice.
- Does disclosure enable informed decisions, or do customers need stronger protections?
- How do product design, distribution and incentives affect customer outcomes?
- How is market abuse, such as insider dealing and manipulation, detected and deterred?
- How do digital channels and personalised pricing change conduct risk?
- How do outcome-based approaches compare with rules-based conduct regulation?
Information gaps and incentives.
Financial products are often complex, long-term and hard to evaluate, and sellers typically know more than buyers. Conduct regulation addresses these asymmetries. Traditional approaches relied on disclosure, but behavioural research shows that many people do not read or understand disclosures and are influenced by framing, defaults and inertia. This has led to approaches focusing on product governance, suitability and outcomes.
Incentives in distribution, such as commissions, can lead to mis-selling. Market integrity depends on deterring abuse that undermines confidence in prices. Digital channels bring convenience but also new risks: design that nudges harmful choices, rapid scaling of poor products and use of data in ways customers do not expect.
How the evidence is built, and where it stops.
- 01
Behavioural research
Studying how customers make decisions, drawing on game theory and behavioural economics. Experiments may not reflect real choices.
- 02
Comparative regulation
Comparing conduct regimes using policy and institutional science. Outcomes depend on enforcement.
- 03
Complaints and outcome data
Analysing published complaints and enforcement data. Data reflects what is reported.
- 04
Market surveillance research
Studying detection of abuse. Detailed surveillance data is confidential.
How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.
- 01Policy, institutional and decision scienceRegulatory impact assessment · Comparing supervisory architecturesApplied here
- 02Game theory and mechanism designHome-host cooperation in resolution · Regulatory competition between jurisdictionsApplied here
- 03Financial economics and macro-financeCosts and benefits of capital requirements · Tracing leakage of macroprudential measuresApplied here
- 04Data engineering, interoperability and stewardshipMapping templates to a common model · Entity resolution with identifiersApplied here
Questions and answers.
What is a suitability rule?
Does more disclosure protect consumers?
What is the difference between a regulator and an ombudsman?
Can this page help with a complaint?
Does disclosure protect consumers?
How does this differ from financial conduct protection?
Does the platform handle complaints against firms?
Contribute evidence from this page.
Reports is the Consortium's quarterly publication. What you know about this subject can become evidence, a case or a correction in the next edition, credited to you and published under CC BY 4.0 where it is your own work.
- EmailGateway GW-GRASend it from this pageEvidence, a correction, a case, a method, a review, a translation or profile input. It arrives tagged with this page, so the editor who owns it receives it.
- ZenodoOpen depositDeposit it and submit to the communityPublish your own record on Zenodo with your ORCID iD, then submit it to the Reports community there. Curators review it; the DOI stays yours.
- ReportsGlobal Risks AllianceSee every way to contributeThe contribution types, how each is reviewed, what credit you receive, the licence and what is never accepted.
Never send personal data, sensitive infrastructure detail or anything you have no right to share. A contribution is reviewed before use; sending it confers no authorship or editorial rights, and sponsorship never buys a finding.
Bring an exposure or capital question to the Alliance.
Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.
Legal documents.
Maps, data and figures on this site are shown for context and general information. They are not advice, forecasts or warnings; the limits of the information are set out in the Disclaimers and Data Notices.