A08 · PROCESS · scenariosGRA dossier · service level R0
GRAInstitutional Funds NexusEstablished
Sector scenarios

Published scenarios

Sector-level scenarios for Institutional Funds Nexus are published here with their assumptions and limits. They describe aggregate exposures; they are not forecasts and not investment advice.

Publisher
The Global Risks Alliance
Field
Capital markets and investment, Society and human development
01In brief

The short answer.

Institutional Funds Nexus sector scenarios are published, aggregated descriptions of how exposures in the capital markets and investment field could evolve under stated assumptions, read against frameworks such as OECD Core Principles of Private Pension Regulation. They describe sector-level exposures with their limits; they are not forecasts, assess no individual firm and are not investment advice.

02Canvas

Scoping to review.

Canvas · scoping to reviewDesign, not a record
Published scenarios: asset-liability managementLiabilities are projected; a strategic asset allocation and risk budget are set; hedges and liquidity buckets cover collateral calls; stress tests check funding; rebalancing and stewardship follow. Design of the process, not a record of a run.

Fig.A programme from scoping to the owner's decision. Design, not a record.

03Spatial finance

A loan book under scenario families.

How physical and transition risk could reach a loan book under different scenarios. Illustrative design values.

A loan book across Europe under physical and transition risk.Design values; NGFS scenario names are labels only, not stress test results.
04Status

Releases appear as they are reviewed.

Analysis runs in Nexus Foundry; reviewed releases are listed here.

05Horizon

Matching scenarios to a fund's horizon.

HorizonScenario sourceUse
Five yearsNGFS short-term scenarios (May 2025)Strategic asset allocation reviews and funding plans
To 2050NGFS long-term scenarios, Phase V; Phase VI announced for 2026Long-horizon beliefs and engagement
Event-definedReverse stress testsWhat would break the funding path
06Caveat

Damage functions under review.

NGFS stated in December 2025 that the paper behind the Phase V physical damage function was retracted, and that users should account for this. Fund scenarios therefore show physical-risk results with a wider uncertainty statement until a revised vintage is published. Climate projections at GCRI climate projections; intergenerational questions at GRF future generations.

07Key terms

Terms used on this page.

Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.

TermDefinition
ScenarioA plausible description of how the future may unfold under stated assumptions, not a prediction.
Severe but plausible scenarioA disruption scenario extreme enough to test resilience yet realistic enough to occur.
Reverse stress testStarting from a failure outcome and identifying the scenarios that would cause it.
Investment adviceA personal recommendation on investments, a regulated activity in most jurisdictions.
09Questions

Questions and answers.

Can I request a map or model?
Write to contact@globalriskalliance.com with what you need and why.
Institutional Funds Nexus

Bring your expertise to this field.

The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

Have questions?