The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)
Financial and real-economy vulnerabilities reinforce each other. Shocks in the real economy reach financial institutions as losses and defaults; financial stress reaches the real economy as tighter credit, falling asset prices and lost confidence. This page shows how vulnerabilities propagate across that boundary and between institutions, and how regulatory design affects whether stress is absorbed or amplified. It describes channels; it does not assess any firm.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 2
Activity and exposure, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For financial-system transmission, in GRA's spatial-finance reading, the map opens on night lights and population density with built-up and settlement extent from NASA GIBS, framed on World; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
Risk transmission in Financial Regulation Nexus is the path by which physical, transition, technology and systemic shocks reach the sector and travel onward through balance sheets, markets and the real economy. Analysis uses aggregated, sector-level indicators such as RCAP jurisdictional consistency grade and Basel III standards in force by jurisdiction; it assesses no individual firm and is not investment advice.
Fig.How GCRI, GRF and GRA share one field while the authorities decide. Design, not a record.
The working screen behind this subject: its structure, terms and states. Names are placeholders and values illustrative.
Recessions, disasters, cyber incidents and transition shocks raise defaults, claims and asset write-downs on financial balance sheets.
Common exposures, funding links, fire sales and loss of confidence spread stress between institutions and markets.
Stressed institutions cut lending and raise prices for risk, which slows investment and can deepen the original shock.
Supervisory colleges and crisis management groups link authorities across financial centres. Mapping them beside cross-border exposures shows where coordination would be tested. Topic depth at cross-border supervision.
Some features of the financial system amplify shocks. Leverage magnifies losses relative to capital. Maturity and liquidity mismatches make institutions vulnerable to funding withdrawal. Rules or practices that respond mechanically to falling prices, such as margin calls and mark-to-market triggers, can force simultaneous selling. Concentration on common service providers, such as cloud platforms or market infrastructures, creates shared operational points of failure.
Regulation aims to dampen these amplifiers: capital and liquidity requirements build buffers, countercyclical tools release them in stress, resolution regimes contain failures, and operational resilience rules address shared dependencies. Research also examines unintended effects, such as rules that encourage the same behaviour across firms or push activity outside the regulated perimeter.
Analysis draws on financial economics and macro-finance and game theory, using published and aggregated data. Every channel map states its assumptions; see methods and uncertainty.
Analysis uses aggregated data at sector level. It does not assess individual firms, recommend transactions or constitute investment advice.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Transmission channel | The route by which a shock reaches financial institutions' balance sheets. |
| Contagion | Transmission of losses or stress from one institution or market to others. |
| Second-round effects | Feedback from bank losses to the economy, such as tighter credit deepening a downturn. |
| Common exposure | Holdings of the same or similar assets by several institutions, which makes their losses move together. |
The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.