Back

How does GRA route each participant into the correct pathway?

GRA routes participants by using a records-first process that considers identity, country pathway, individual or institutional status, sector expertise, areas of interest, payment status, conflicts, role suitability, visibility preference, and participation boundaries. 

The process begins with account setup and profile completion. The participant identifies their country or regional pathway, sector background, professional role, employer or affiliation for context, areas of interest, individual or institutional capacity, and relevant GRA platform interests. 

The participant may then be routed into one or more pathways: 

individual Nexus Consortium Council Subscription; 

National Stewardship Council interest; 

GRA sector platform participation; 

observer status; 

Stewardship Pool; 

Capital-Reader Room interest; 

Insurance-Readiness Room interest; 

Nexus Rails workstream; 

NFD, RNFD, or UNSFD pathway; 

Project SPV-readiness; 

National Nexus Consortium Company readiness; 

Nexus Universe preparation; 

Helix Councils or institutional pathway; 

sponsorship pathway; 

host, anchor, or partner pathway; 

public authority learning pathway. 

Routing does not mean acceptance. A form submission, interest selection, payment, nomination, or invitation may still require review. 

GRA’s routing model should answer four questions: 

Who is the participant? 

What capacity are they participating in? 

What pathway fits their role and expertise? 

What boundaries are required to keep the pathway safe? 

The purpose is to place each person or institution where they can contribute responsibly without creating false authority, false access, false finance, false insurance, or false public approval. 

Have questions?