The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)
Development finance institutions, country-level resilience evidence and safeguarded project readiness. Development Finance Nexus is an established platform published by The Global Risks Alliance.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 2
Infrastructure exposure, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For development finance nexus, in GRA's spatial-finance reading, the map opens on night lights and population density with built-up and settlement extent from NASA GIBS, framed on Southern Africa; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
Development finance risk is the risk that public and concessional finance for development fails to reach its purpose or creates new burdens, through weak preparation, unsustainable debt, safeguard failures or misallocated risk. Development Finance Nexus, The Global Risks Alliance's platform for the field, follows that risk from country priorities to projects and evidence; it approves, certifies and advises on nothing.
DFIs; policy economists; infrastructure risk specialists; development researchers.
Readiness dossier methods; ESG safeguards; country-risk evidence.
Development-finance-readiness guides; risk-evidence examples.
The working screen behind this platform: its structure, terms and states. Names are placeholders and values illustrative.
Country programme D · Pipeline review 4
| Irrigation rehabilitation | Food and water | Medium | Clear | Appraisal |
| Port expansion | Infrastructure | High | Finding | Preparation |
| SME credit line | Finance | Low | Clear | Board |
| Mini-grid programme | Energy | Low | Clear | Implementation |
red: high hazard exposure
Where development projects meet hazard and poverty, and which financing layer protects them. Hypothetical projects and design values.
Evidence for national and regional development priorities.
TopicInfrastructure preparation and risks.
TopicDevelopment challenges and adaptation.
TopicEssential service resilience.
TopicEquity and human development.
TopicEvidence before institutional decisions.
TopicEnvironmental and social safeguards.
TopicReceivers, independent diligence and limitations.
TopicProject preparation, financial risk and public infrastructure safeguards.
TopicDevelopment finance and small enterprise access.
Development Finance Nexus studies how development finance reaches projects and programmes and how risk moves through it: country priorities and debt capacity, project preparation and safeguards, infrastructure and project finance, climate adaptation, essential services, inclusion and small enterprise finance. Its pages set out the mechanisms, records, frameworks and decision holders for each part, from the financial-sector view of The Global Risks Alliance, with every indicator labelled by its evidence. It describes shared industry understanding and gives no investment advice.
National priorities, debt capacity, institutional readiness and how development partners align their country strategies to them.
Identification, feasibility, appraisal, procurement and maintenance of public infrastructure, and the gates where project risk is decided.
Special purpose companies, partnerships, risk allocation by contract, currency mismatch and the contingent liabilities that return to the state.
Tracking, alignment and evaluation of finance that reduces vulnerability, and how physical climate risk enters credit and design.
Utilities, offtakers, irrigation and food systems as correlated exposures in development portfolios.
Environmental and social standards, the mitigation hierarchy, monitoring, grievance and independent accountability mechanisms.
Who benefits, who bears the costs, and how finance reaches households and small firms through intermediaries.
Official and mobilised flows, financing gap estimates, the assumptions behind them and the handoff of evidence to decision holders.
Roads, power plants, water systems, irrigation schemes and social programmes are financed to last for decades. Over those decades they will face floods, droughts, heat, conflict, price shocks and technological change. Too often, that exposure is assessed late, partially or not at all.
Development finance flows from multilateral and bilateral development banks, development finance institutions, public budgets, private investors and philanthropy. Much of it goes to countries and sectors where data are thin, institutions are stretched and hazards are severe. When a project is designed without good evidence on climate, hazard and social risk, it can fail early, cost more to maintain or shift risk to the people it was meant to serve. A bridge built below a realistic flood level, a water scheme that depletes an aquifer or a resettlement plan that ignores livelihoods are familiar examples.
The consequences cascade. Damaged infrastructure interrupts services and trade; repair costs fall on public budgets that may already be under strain; contingent liabilities from public-private partnerships crystallize in a crisis; and the loss of confidence can raise the cost of finance for the whole country. Disaster losses and debt distress reinforce one another, and the poorest households carry the largest relative burden.
The obstacle is often not money alone but evidence and preparation. Lenders and investors need decision-useful information on risk, resilience and safeguards before they can act under their own rules, and countries need the capacity to produce it. Building a shared understanding of what good evidence looks like, across institutions that compete and cooperate, is the work of this platform.
The platform helps the industry agree on what decision-useful resilience evidence looks like, and how it should travel from country programmes to the institutions that make their own decisions.
Methods for assembling the evidence, risks and governance a programme needs before a competent institution can review it independently. See readiness.
Shared understanding of safeguard practice: risk screening, consultation, grievance and monitoring, drawing on established standards.
How hazard, climate, fiscal and institutional evidence combine into a country-level picture of resilience.
GRA is a nonprofit business league for the financial services industry. It does not lend, underwrite, rate, invest, advise on or arrange transactions, introduce counterparties or take transaction-based pay, and readiness work is not approval. GRA recommends no project, country, instrument or counterparty.
The platform applies economics and development economics, causal inference and impact evaluation, geospatial information systems, decision analysis under uncertainty and agricultural, soil and food science, listed on the platform STEM foundation. It draws on the Nexus Foundry systems Decision Support System, GRIx and Institutional Rails, and contributes to the Finance and Insurance Readiness and Portfolio and Readiness series of Nexus Reports.
The underlying science is done at The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI), with Economic Development, Water Nexus, Energy Nexus, Critical Infrastructure, Cities and Built Environment and Cybersecurity and Digital Resilience; bounded technical assistance is organized through Nexus Agency. At The Global Risks Forum (GRF), Capital Nexus and Disaster and Crisis Governance convene the institutions that govern capital and crisis arrangements. See counterparts across the Consortium.
A readiness dossier for a resilience programme is the platform's theme in the Nexus Universe programme, exercised as a learning case without any real transaction.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Development finance | Public and concessional finance from development banks, agencies and funds, together with the private finance they mobilise, for development goals. |
| Blended finance | The strategic use of development finance to mobilise additional commercial finance, in the OECD DAC definition. |
| Environmental and social safeguards | Requirements lenders set so financed projects avoid, minimise and offset harm to people and the environment. |
| Mobilised private finance | Private finance attributed to an official intervention under agreed counting methods. |
Every claim on Development Finance Nexus rests on methods with a canonical page in the STEM Commons, so readers can see what a finding depends on and where its limits lie.
A question becomes evidence, a governed build, an organized community, a controlled test, a reviewed publication and, finally, a decision taken by the competent authority under its own rules.
Fig.The Nexus cycle on this platform, from question to renewal. Design, not a record of a run.
The platform does not set standards. It reads its evidence against the frameworks that competent bodies have adopted, so a finding can be placed where a decision-maker already works.
| Framework or standard | Body | What it sets |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental and Social Framework | World Bank | Ten environmental and social standards for investment project financing, with risk classification, commitment plans, consultation and disclosure |
| Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability | International Finance Corporation | Eight standards for private sector clients covering risk management, labour, pollution, community health, land, biodiversity, indigenous peoples and cultural heritage |
| Equator Principles | Equator Principles Association | Risk management framework adopted by financial institutions to determine, assess and manage environmental and social risk in project finance |
| OECD DAC Blended Finance Principles | OECD Development Assistance Committee | Principles for using development finance to mobilise commercial finance, with attention to development rationale, context, partnership, impact and transparency |
| G20 Principles for Quality Infrastructure Investment | G20 | Principles on positive impact, life-cycle economic efficiency, environmental and social considerations, resilience to disasters, and governance |
| Joint MDB approach to Paris alignment | Multilateral development banks | Building blocks for aligning new operations and financial flows with the mitigation and adaptation goals of the Paris Agreement |
| Debt Sustainability Framework for Low-Income Countries | IMF and World Bank | Debt-carrying capacity, risk of debt distress ratings, thresholds and stress tests that guide borrowing and concessional lending |
| Addis Ababa Action Agenda | United Nations, Third International Conference on Financing for Development | Framework for financing sustainable development across domestic, international, public and private resources, debt and systemic issues |
| Open Contracting Data Standard | Open Contracting Partnership | Common data model for disclosing public contracting from planning and tender to award, contract and implementation |
| Joint methodologies for tracking climate finance | Multilateral development banks and the International Development Finance Club | Common principles for mitigation finance and a component-based method for counting adaptation finance |
GCRI studies a field as science, GRF governs it and GRA builds shared financial understanding of it. Development Finance Nexus links to its counterparts so that work on one side is visible on the others.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.