No. Capital readability does not mean investment readiness.
Capital readability means that a matter has been organized in a way that helps financial-services actors understand the basic context, evidence, risks, governance questions, public-good rationale, insurance considerations, and diligence gaps. It is about making information legible.
Investment readiness is a much stronger claim. It may imply that a project or company is prepared for investor review, has appropriate documentation, has credible financial structure, has investable terms, has resolved key risks, or is ready to seek capital. GRA should not use that term unless it is very carefully defined and approved for the specific context.
A capital-readable summary may still identify major gaps. It may conclude that the matter is not ready for downstream review. It may show that legal, technical, financial, environmental, social, governance, insurance, public authority, or procurement questions remain unresolved.
Capital readability is a preparation concept. It is not a conclusion of investment readiness.
