GRA · Actuarial and Quantitative Risk

Spatial financeWhere capital meets hazard, exposure and transition

Subject groups

Quantitative groups would open only after a scope, a moderator and written terms exist; none is open.

01Workspace

The workspace for subject groups.

Community workspace

Actuarial and quantitative risk · Subject groups · Example interface, not a record

6 requests to reviewGRA · Actuarial and Quantitative Risk

Working groups

Validation WG284Week 33Active
Capital model WG229Week 30Active
Assumptions WG353Week 23Active
Reserving WG135Week 37Active

Join requests

  1. J-1Hydrologist, early careerValidation WG5 d
  2. J-2Utility engineerCapital model WG9 d
  3. J-3Conflict of interest to declareAssumptions WG2 d

Contributions

Proposed01
Quarterly reservingcredit: named
In review01
Capital model validationtwo reviewers
Accepted01
Reserving reportcredited on record
Community workspace.Illustrative interface; not live data.

Actuarial and Quantitative Risk · Community workspace. Community workspace: example names and illustrative values, not a record.

02How it works

Subject groups in Actuarial and Quantitative Risk.

  • Each entry shows its scope, host or owner, and terms.
  • Participation follows published rules, applied equally.
  • Taking part gives no authority or influence over findings.
03Proposed groups

Groups.

GroupWould examineOutside scope
Tail estimationMethods and intervalsAny firm’s parameters
Climate-adjusted pricingTrend methodsPrices

Related topics: extreme value methods and climate-adjusted pricing.

Each proposed Actuarial and Quantitative Risk group would publish its scope, moderator and terms before opening, and would work from losses, hazards, exposures.

04Process

How the process runs.

Process

Subject groups: Working group, charter to sunset

A working group is chartered by record for a fixed timebox, delivers bounded assignments, drafts and recommends, then dissolves unless renewed; it does not adopt.

  1. 01 Form

    1. 01NLC proposes the groupDecision · National Leadership CouncilThe NLC proposes working groups and nominates chairs, editors and experts from its leadership pools. It does not charter.
    2. 02Charter by recordDecision · National Standards CouncilA working group is chartered by record for a timebox of at most twenty-four months. The charter sets its scope, roles and decision rule.
    3. 03Members join by competenceStep · MembersExperts, practitioners, students and volunteers join by competence. Members declare interests and recuse on conflict.
  2. 02 Work

    1. 04Workplan from the national agendaStepAssignments come from the national agenda and the year’s missions. Each states the competence it needs and how the work will be reviewed.
    2. 05Drafts and deliverables, delivered monthlyRecordGroups deliver monthly. For standards they draft the national profile and deviation register and run national public comment and pilots.
  3. 03 Review

    1. 06Contribution record and reviewGateEach contribution is recorded and reviewed. A working group drafts and recommends; it does not adopt.
    2. 07Recognition follows the recordRecordContribution records are kept, so that recognition follows the record.
    3. 08National adoption is decided elsewhereDecision · National Standards CouncilThe National Standards Council decides the adoption mode and the national profile. The working group proposes and never decides.
  4. 04 Close

    1. 09Dissolved by default, or renewed by recordDecision · National Standards CouncilA group is dissolved by default at the end of the timebox. The National Standards Council renews or closes it, on the NLC’s proposal.

National Working Groups · National Standards Council · Decision rightsDesigned programme process, not a record of operation. No cycle has run and every programme is at service level R0. A gate is a programme decision, never a public-authority approval, certification or deployment authorisation. No working group is constituted. The charter rules belong to the proposed Nexus Standards working model.

05Next step

Register your interest.

Write to the contact form. The acknowledgement gives a reference and names the next step.

06Sources

Where this page’s references lead.

The bodies and documents this page is read against. Status and editions change; each link goes to the issuing body.

07Questions

Questions and answers.

When are entries added?
When their hosting, terms and moderation are confirmed.
Actuarial and Quantitative Risk

Bring an exposure or capital question to the Alliance.

Information and enquiries are open today. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

The Global Risks Alliance

Finance · trust · precision

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Support our work

Who funds us

GRA is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.