Yes. Repeated boundary violations can affect good standing.
A single accidental mistake may be corrected through a stop-line intervention, reminder, clarification, or meeting note. However, repeated violations, refusal to follow meeting instructions, intentional sharing of restricted information, continued solicitation, repeated overclaiming, or repeated attempts to move discussion into pricing, underwriting, lending, investment, procurement, public authority, or competitor-sensitive territory may lead to restrictions, suspension, removal from meetings, loss of room eligibility, loss of Council eligibility, or termination of participation.
Good standing depends on more than payment. It requires safe conduct, accurate claims, conflict discipline, information-handling compliance, and respect for meeting boundaries.
Participants who repeatedly violate boundaries may also be barred from Capital-Reader Rooms, Insurance-Readiness Rooms, National Stewardship Council roles, Nexus Universe preparation, sector platform leadership, or institutional engagement.
The standard is practical and serious: GRA must remain safe enough for responsible financial-services, public authority, technical, and public-good actors to participate.
Boundary discipline protects the entire architecture.
