ReportsIJRG

International Journal of Global Risks and Governance

Publisher of record
GCRI for the Nexus Consortium
Editor
Saeed Valadbaygi, Chief Steward and Managing Editor, GCRI
Licence
CC BY 4.0, open access
Report series
17
Networks
7

Draft, not yet released. In stewardship review. Not indexed until the first approved release.

GRA Capital Readiness · Start here

Start here: how this desk of Reports works

Abstract. Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, and the Global Risks Alliance writes the desk that asks whether finance and insurance can read a finding. If you price risk or allocate capital, this desk tells you what the evidence supports and what it does not.

For
insurers, banks, investors and public finance teams
Status
Draft, not yet released

01What Reports is

Reports is the Consortium’s quarterly publication, and the Global Risks Alliance writes the desk that asks whether finance and insurance can read a finding. If you price risk or allocate capital, this desk tells you what the evidence supports and what it does not.

Atlas of the GRA Capital Readiness desk: its mandate, the series it leads, the eight chapters of its edition, what to send here and its Zenodo community. The sections below give the same facts as text.
The GRA Capital Readiness desk atlas, with its facts written out below.

02This desk: Capital Readiness

The Alliance holds the capital meaning of an edition: protection gaps, portfolio readiness and disclosure. It states what a finding can and cannot be used for in a balance sheet.

Mandate: How far finance and insurance are ready for the risks in scope: protection gaps, disclosure practice, portfolio readiness and the capacity of balance sheets, read on a ladder of evidence and never as advice or a rating.

Series this desk leads:

  • Finance and Insurance Readiness
  • Portfolio and Readiness

03The six desks

Capital Readiness is one of six desks, and it deposits to its own Zenodo community under the flagship.

Diagram of the six desks and the flagship Zenodo community nexusreports. The table below lists the desks.
The six desks
DeskEditionZenodo community
GCRISystems Evidencenexusreports-gcri
GRFPublic Deliberationnexusreports-grf
GRACapital Readinessnexusreports-gra
NXSStandards Progressnexusreports-nxs
RACapabilitynexusreports-ra
GRXMeasurementnexusreports-grx

Every record carries a DOI and a full version history.

04The edition in eight chapters, in this desk’s terms

Each chapter is framed in the language of capital, from exposure to market actions.

The eight chapters of the Capital Readiness edition
ChapterTitleWhat it covers
1Exposure and capitalThe exposures in scope and the capital that stands behind them, as public sources state them.
2Readiness findingsThe readiness findings of the edition, each placed on the ladder of evidence with its source.
3Protection gaps by sectorWhere insured and uninsured losses diverge, by sector, from published loss and cover data.
4Balance-sheet and insurance capacityThe capacity of public and private balance sheets and of insurance to absorb the risks in scope.
5Stress testA conditional stress test under stated assumptions; never a forecast, a rating or advice.
6Readings from the other desksReadings from the other desks: cross-references to their editions for the same scope, not copies of them.
7Market actionsActions markets and public finance could examine, stated as questions for evidence, never as recommendations.
8Instruments and productsThe instruments and products in use or under discussion, described from their public documentation.

05How to contribute

Send the Alliance a protection gap with its source, an insurance or finance case, or a disclosure practice that other firms could adopt. Name the instrument and the data behind it.

This desk takes:

  • Evidence of a protection gap, with its source and the period it covers
  • An insurance or finance case, documented with where its record is kept
  • Disclosure practice, with the framework it reports against
  • A correction to a readiness statement in a Capital Readiness edition

The gateway page of the GRA Capital Readiness desk gives the route.

06The editorial workflow

A case from a regulated firm passes the same gates as every other contribution. The legal check is part of the release, so state early what you can disclose.

Diagram of the editorial workflow in six steps: submit, screen, review, decide, accept, publish, with a revision branch and a decline or appeal branch. The list below gives every step.
The editorial workflow
StepWhat happens
1. SubmitContributor declarations and licence terms are signed first.
2. ScreenEditors check scope, completeness and licensing.
3. ReviewPeer review runs under the model declared at submission. Authors may revise, then the work returns to review.
4. DecideNamed editors decide and record their reasons. Declined work can be appealed through a separate route.
5. AcceptThe decision is recorded and the work moves to production.
6. PublishA named editor publishes. The DOI is issued.

Refusals are written to a hash-chained log: before_window, after_window, wrong_state, agreement_required, passes_missing, approver_is_author. No request carries a time. No capability overrides a gate. Voting is advisory and never moves a submission.

07The sixteen-gate quarterly cycle

Reporting calendars differ across firms. The evidence close is the date that matters: a figure supplied after it is read in the next cycle.

Diagram of the sixteen gates of a quarterly cycle, from the call opening to the corrections window closing. The list below gives every gate.
The sixteen gates of a quarterly cycle
OrderGateMeaning
1call_openThe call opens.
2call_closeThe call closes.
3submission_deadlineLast moment to submit into this cycle. Later submissions roll to the next cycle.
4triage_closeIntake triage must be finished.
5review_openThe review window opens.
6reviewer_reminderFirst reminder to reviewers.
7review_closeReviews are due. Overdue reviews escalate and are reassigned.
8decision_dateThe editorial decision is due.
9revision_closeThe revision window ends.
10copyedit_freezeCopyedit and data-check freeze.
11evidence_closeEvidence close.
12production_closeProduction ends.
13release_approvalThe named approver signs the release.
14releaseRelease date. It is the anchor of the cycle.
15deposit_approvalZenodo deposit approval. The deposit stays a draft until then.
16corrections_closeThe corrections window ends.

Cycle codes are 2026-BASELINE, then 2027-Q1 to 2027-Q4. The release date is the only date the owner sets. Until it is set, every gate is unscheduled and every gated step is refused.

08Release control

Capital users should note the legal and licence checks. A figure leaves the edition only when its source and its licence allow reuse.

Diagram of release control: seven checks must pass, the named approver signs, six artefacts are fixed with checksums, the Zenodo deposit stays a draft, then the record is published with a DOI.
  • Check: Peer review passes.
  • Check: Data check.
  • Check: Citation check.
  • Check: Accessibility check.
  • Check: Legal check.
  • Check: Licence and file rules.
  • Check: Approver is not an author.
  • The named approver signs a plan bound to the release digest.
  • Six artefacts are fixed, each with a SHA-256 checksum: edition-pack, web, print, data-bundle, ro-crate, citation-metadata.
  • The Zenodo deposit stays a draft until the deposit approval gate.
  • The record is published with a DOI. A correction is a new version that keeps the concept DOI.

Release approval, deposit approval and publication are separate acts.

09Open licensing

Your figures stay yours. Where the data is yours to share, an edition may publish it under CC0 1.0. Where it is not, the edition cites it and does not republish it.

Licence rules

  • Text, figures and maps: CC BY 4.0 (SPDX: CC-BY-4.0).
  • Data: CC0 1.0 (SPDX: CC0-1.0).
  • Code: an OSI-approved licence.
  • Media: CC BY 4.0 or CC0 1.0.
  • No NC, ND or SA licence on our own outputs. No paywall, no embargo on text, no fees.

Shared text. It is the same on every Reports site by design.

10Zenodo community and DOIs

Alliance records go to the Alliance community on Zenodo. It exists and is curated by the Alliance desk; it holds no records yet.

This desk’s community: zenodo.org/communities/nexusreports-gra

  • Flagship community: nexusreports. It exists and holds records today.
  • Every record carries a DOI and a full version history. A correction becomes a new version and keeps the concept DOI.

Shared text. It is the same on every Reports site by design.

11The open science stack, with its honest status

Institution identifiers matter to this audience. ROR is not complete until GCRI’s id is supplied, and the Crossref route is an export only.

Diagram of the open science stack with the status of each integration. The table below gives every status.
The open science stack and its status
IntegrationWhat it doesStatus
ZenodoDOIs, deposits and versionsBuilt
ORCIDContributor identity and review creditBuilt
RORInstitution identifiersNeeds the id
COAR NotifyInbox for peer review servicesBuilt
OAI-PMHA harvesting endpointBuilt
JATS XMLJournal article markupBuilt
RO-CrateResearch object packagingBuilt
CrossrefAn export, not in useExport only

Free and open routes only. Production deposits stay gated until adoption.

Cite

Reports, GRA Capital Readiness, start here [Draft under review]. The Global Centre for Risk and Innovation (GCRI) for the Nexus Consortium.

Review copy. The DOI is issued at deposit. Text under CC BY 4.0.

CC BY 4.0 Free to read. Text and figures: CC BY 4.0. Data: CC0 1.0. Authors keep copyright. Published by GCRI Canada.

Your role here

What you can do from this page.

  • ReaderCite what you read; every correction is public.Corrections log
  • ContributorSend evidence, data or a correction to this desk.Contribute
  • ReviewerReview for this desk; verified reviews are credited.Become a reviewer
  • Editor, steward or boardQueues, decisions and production are in the workspace.My workspace
The Global Risks Alliance

Finance · trust · precision

Not for profit

Our articles, maps and twins are free to read and free to republish. Readers and partners keep it that way.

Partner with us

Who funds us

GRA is a not-for-profit institution. To ask who funds a piece of work, use the funding questions form.

Independence

Editors and the expert reviewers named on each article decide what we publish. Funders and partners do not review or approve articles before publication.

Licence

Articles: CC BY 4.0. Figures, maps, twins and data: CC BY 4.0. Other uses: ask through the permissions form.