The Global Risks Alliance (GRA)
Conduct regulation governs how financial firms design, sell and service products and how they behave in markets. Customers face complex products, unequal information and predictable behavioural biases; markets depend on fair dealing and price integrity. This page explains how conduct failures develop from product design to mis-selling and market abuse, how they spread across firms, which measures securities and consumer protection authorities use, and what the evidence can and cannot show.
GRA · Established · service level R0
Conduct regulation governs how financial firms design, sell and service products and behave in markets. Customers face complex products, unequal information and predictable biases, so disclosure alone rarely protects them; suitability rules, product governance, intervention powers, ombudsman schemes and market abuse rules fill the gap.
For market conduct and consumer protection, in GRA's spatial-finance reading, the map opens on night lights and population density with built-up and settlement extent from NASA GIBS, framed on World; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.
The interactive map needs JavaScript; the layer list and sources are below.
Layers 2
Activity and exposure, for this page
Keyboard, with the map focused
Hold Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll to zoom
Latest available
NASA GIBS / EOSDIS · ASTER GDEM (METI, NASA) · Blue Marble (NASA) · © OpenStreetMap contributors (ODbL) · Natural Earth
Loading the latest NASA imagery.
Drag to move. Ctrl or ⌘ and scroll, pinch or the buttons to zoom; hover for the values under the pointer; reset returns to the region.
For market conduct and consumer protection, in GRA's spatial-finance reading, the map opens on night lights and population density with built-up and settlement extent from NASA GIBS, framed on World; every other NASA layer, live feed and forecast waits in the layer list.Satellite and model products as NASA publishes them, each with its own date; indicators, not assessments of any place; claim ceiling INTEGRATED.
Layers and dates
The working screen behind this subject: its structure, terms and states. Names are placeholders and values illustrative.
Market conduct and consumer protection · Bank supervision · Cycle 1
| Bank B | High | 3 | 7 | Enhanced |
| Bank D | Medium | 2 | 1 | Standard |
| Insurer Alpha | High | 3 | 4 | Enhanced |
| Fintech F1 | Low | 2 | 2 | Light |
share of firms, thematic review
Disclosure, fairness and protection. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.
Long or complex disclosure meets the letter of the rule while customers still cannot compare price, risk or terms. Present bias, inertia and overconfidence let poor-value products persist even in markets with many competitors.
Commissions, sales targets and conflicted advice push products to customers they do not fit. Product governance and suitability rules act at the design and distribution stages, before harm shows up as complaints.
A profitable practice spreads as competitors copy it, so mis-selling is often industry-wide. When it surfaces, redress, litigation and lost trust land together, and large remediation can carry prudential consequences.
Insider dealing, manipulation and front-running distort prices and deter participation. Fragmented venues and fast trading make surveillance depend on complete, timely transaction and order reporting.
Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Suitability rule | A requirement that a firm recommend only products that fit a customer's needs, circumstances and risk tolerance. |
| Product intervention | A regulator's power to restrict or ban the marketing or sale of a financial product. |
| Redress | Compensation paid to customers harmed by a firm's misconduct. |
Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.
| Indicator | Unit | Cadence | Source type | Label |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer complaints by product | count per product per period | quarterly | Regulator and ombudsman complaint data | REPORTED |
| Complaints upheld by an ombudsman | percent of decided complaints upheld | semi-annual | Ombudsman publications | OFFICIAL |
| Conduct enforcement actions | count of final notices, orders and settlements | annual | Regulator enforcement registers | OFFICIAL |
| Redress paid under remediation schemes | currency amount per scheme | per scheme | Regulator and firm disclosures | REPORTED |
| Suspicious transaction and order reports | count of reports received | annual | Market abuse reporting to regulators | OFFICIAL |
| Product intervention measures in force | count by product type and authority | annual | Product intervention notices | OFFICIAL |
| Consumer protection legal coverage | presence of specified protections by jurisdiction | per survey round | World Bank consumer protection survey | OFFICIAL |
| IOSCO principles observance | grade per principle | per FSAP | IMF and World Bank detailed assessment | OFFICIAL |
The topic as a computational graph: named sources feed the methods, an evidence review gates the outputs, and the decisions stay with the authorities that hold them.
Fig. 02Nodes carry their type, two metric rows and a state; connectors show what feeds what; dashed frames name the owners; the timeline is the cadence. Design of the pipeline, not a record of a run.
Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.
| Source | What it gives | Licence class |
|---|---|---|
| CFPB Consumer Complaint Database | Complaints about consumer financial products and companies' responses, United States | Public domain, US government work |
| FCA Financial Services Register and complaints data | Authorisation status of firms and firm-level complaint returns, United Kingdom | Open Government Licence |
| ESMA sanctions register and product intervention notices | Sanctions under EU securities law and product intervention measures | Public, reuse with attribution |
| SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings | Enforcement actions under US securities law | Public domain, US government work |
| World Bank Global Financial Inclusion and Consumer Protection Survey | Cross-country records of consumer protection law, institutions and practice | Free and open, CC BY |
| IMF FSAP detailed assessments of the IOSCO Principles | Assessments of securities regulation, including conduct and market integrity | Public, IMF copyright and terms |
| Financial ombudsman published decisions | Decisions on individual complaints showing how fairness standards are applied | Public records, terms per scheme |
Financial Regulation Nexus prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.
| Who decides | The question | Evidence this page serves |
|---|---|---|
| Securities and conduct regulators | Which products, practices and firms to prioritise for supervision and enforcement | Complaint trends by product, enforcement case histories, product intervention precedents |
| Consumer protection authorities and legislatures | Whether disclosure rules, cooling-off rights or product bans are needed | Comparative rules, behavioural evidence on disclosure, case histories of harm |
| Financial ombudsman schemes | How to apply fairness standards consistently across similar complaints | Published decisions and the rules and guidance they apply |
| Boards of financial firms | Whether products deliver fair value and whether incentives drive mis-selling | Product governance expectations, enforcement precedents, complaint root-cause practice |
Conduct researchers ask what makes financial markets fair in practice.
Financial products are often complex, long-term and hard to evaluate, and sellers typically know more than buyers. Conduct regulation addresses these asymmetries. Traditional approaches relied on disclosure, but behavioural research shows that many people do not read or understand disclosures and are influenced by framing, defaults and inertia. This has led to approaches focusing on product governance, suitability and outcomes.
Incentives in distribution, such as commissions, can lead to mis-selling. Market integrity depends on deterring abuse that undermines confidence in prices. Digital channels bring convenience but also new risks: design that nudges harmful choices, rapid scaling of poor products and use of data in ways customers do not expect.
Studying how customers make decisions, drawing on game theory and behavioural economics. Experiments may not reflect real choices.
Comparing conduct regimes using policy and institutional science. Outcomes depend on enforcement.
Analysing published complaints and enforcement data. Data reflects what is reported.
Studying detection of abuse. Detailed surveillance data is confidential.
The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.