A-P04 · TOPIC · physical-climate-riskGRA dossier · service level R0
GRAClimate and Nature Financial RiskIn development
Topic dossier · Climate and Nature Financial Risk

Physical climate risk

Physical climate risk is the financial risk from climate hazards: acute events such as floods, storms and wildfire, and chronic shifts such as heat, drought and sea level rise. It reaches finance through damaged collateral, interrupted operations, falling property values and rising insurance costs. This page sets out how physical risk transmits to financial institutions, how it is measured, and who decides.

01In brief

The short answer.

Physical climate risk is the financial risk from climate hazards, such as floods, storms, wildfire, heat and sea level rise, that damage assets and disrupt activity. It reaches finance through collateral values, borrower income and insurance availability. Credit committees, supervisors, insurers and investors hold the decisions.

02Spatial finance

Assets on the grid, and the portfolio they make.

Where a portfolio's assets sit, and how much of its value is most exposed. Hypothetical assets, not an assessment.

Sixteen assets at real towns, and the share of portfolio value in the most exposed places.Hypothetical assets and design scores, not advice.
03Console

Climate scenario analysis, in outline.

The working screen behind this subject: its structure, terms and states. Names are placeholders and values illustrative.

Climate scenario analysis

Physical climate risk · Bank loan book · Exercise 3

Disorderly case breaches appetiteGRA · Climate and Nature Financial Risk

Scenario pipeline

  1. Select scenariosorderly · disorderly · hot house
  2. Pathwayscarbon price · GDP
  3. Sector impactsmargins
  4. Physical hazardsassets
  5. Credit parametersPD · LGD
  6. Portfolio losscapital
  7. Discloselimits

PD uplift by sector and scenario

basis points, illustrative

Expected loss path

Climate scenario analysis: the screen's structure, terms and states for Physical climate risk.Placeholder names and illustrative values; a design, not a record or a live system.
04The question

Physical climate risk: how the risk develops.

Direct and indirect asset exposures. The dossier below sets out how the risk develops, what is measured, where the data come from, how it is modelled and who decides.

Mechanism

Collateral loses value

Property in flood zones or exposed coasts can lose value as damage, insurance costs and buyer awareness rise. Mortgages and real estate loans secured on it carry higher loss given default.

Mechanism

Operations and supply chains break

Heat, flood and drought interrupt production, logistics and labour. Firms' revenues and ability to repay fall, often at suppliers far from the hazard.

Mechanism

Insurance retreats

Rising losses push premiums up and capacity out. Uninsured assets transfer losses to owners and lenders and can lower property values further.

Mechanism

Losses correlate regionally

A lender concentrated in one region suffers many borrower losses at once. Regional banks and local governments are most exposed.

05Key terms

Terms used on this page.

Each term as this page uses it. Where a standard-setting body defines the term, the wording follows that body.

TermDefinition
Acute physical riskRisk from event-driven hazards such as floods, cyclones and wildfires.
Chronic physical riskRisk from gradual climate shifts such as rising temperatures and sea levels.
Loss given defaultThe share of an exposure lost if a borrower defaults, after recoveries such as collateral sale.
06Indicators

What is measured, and how well.

Each indicator carries its unit, its cadence, the kind of source behind it and the evidence label a value would carry. No values are shown: a programme supplies them under its own authority.

IndicatorUnitCadenceSource typeLabel
Loan exposure to high physical risk areascurrency and share of portfolioannualBank disclosures and supervisory dataDECLARED
Collateral in flood zonesshare of mortgage collateral valueannualBank data with hazard mapsMODELLED
Expected annual damage to portfolio assetscurrency per yearper assessmentPhysical risk modelsMODELLED
Insurance coverage of collateralshare insured against relevant perilsperiodicBank and insurer dataREPORTED
Physical risk score by assetscore from vendor or internal modelannualPhysical risk providersMODELLED
Economic losses from climate-related disasterscurrencyannualDisaster loss databasesESTIMATED
07Canvas

From sources to decisions.

The topic as a computational graph: named sources feed the methods, an evidence review gates the outputs, and the decisions stay with the authorities that hold them.

Pipeline canvas · Physical climate risk as a run graphDesign, not a record
Physical climate risk: the LEAP approach to nature-related issuesLocate the interface with nature and sensitive locations, Evaluate dependencies and impacts, Assess the risks and opportunities they create, and Prepare strategy, targets and disclosure. Design of the process, not a record of a run.

Fig. 02Nodes carry their type, two metric rows and a state; connectors show what feeds what; dashed frames name the owners; the timeline is the cadence. Design of the pipeline, not a record of a run.

08Sources

Where the evidence comes from.

Named public datasets and institutional records, each with its licence class. Sources by agreement are used only under their terms and never republished.

SourceWhat it givesLicence class
ECB climate-related indicatorsExperimental physical risk indicators for euro area financial exposuresFree, ECB terms
NGFS climate scenarios physical risk dataChronic and acute physical risk damage functionsFree, NGFS terms
Copernicus Climate Data StoreClimate projections and indicatorsFree and open, Copernicus licence
First Street Foundation and similar property-level hazard dataProperty-level flood, fire and heat risk scoresProprietary, terms to check
EIOPA and ECB reports on climate physical riskAnalysis of physical risk in EU insurance and bankingFree, EU reuse terms
FEMA National Risk IndexCounty-level natural hazard risk in the United StatesPublic domain
09Decisions

Who decides, and what the evidence serves.

Climate and Nature Financial Risk prepares evidence. The decisions below are taken by the authorities named, under their own rules, and never by the platform.

Who decidesThe questionEvidence this page serves
Bank credit risk committeesWhether to adjust lending, pricing or collateral valuation for physical riskExposure, hazard and insurance evidence with sources
Prudential supervisorsWhether physical risk is adequately managed and capitalisedSupervisory data, scenario results and model reviews
InsurersWhether to continue writing cover in high-hazard areasHazard trends and loss experience
InvestorsHow physical risk affects asset values in portfoliosPhysical risk data with uncertainty

Outputs this topic produces

  • Guide to physical risk transmission channels for banks, insurers and investors
  • Method note on linking hazard maps to collateral data
  • Brief on reading vendor physical risk scores
  • Questions for boards on regional concentration
10Core questions

What risk modellers ask.

  • Which assets are exposed to which hazards, and how vulnerable are they?
  • How will hazard frequency and severity change over the relevant horizon?
  • How do indirect effects, through suppliers, customers and infrastructure, add to direct damage?
  • How do exposures concentrate across portfolios and institutions?
11Mechanisms

From hazard to financial loss.

Risk is commonly expressed as the combination of hazard, exposure and vulnerability. A flood of a given depth causes damage that depends on building type, elevation and protection. Damage becomes insurance claims, repair costs, lost revenue and, for borrowers, reduced ability to repay. Chronic changes erode value more slowly, for example as heat lowers labour productivity or rising seas raise the cost of protecting coastal property.

Indirect effects can exceed direct damage. A factory may be undamaged but unable to operate because a supplier, port or power plant is. Many institutions underestimate these effects because they are hard to trace.

12Methods and data

How exposure is assessed, with limits.

  1. 01

    Catastrophe and hazard models

    Probabilistic models of events and damage, informed by climate and atmospheric science. Many were built for current climate and need adjustment for change.

  2. 02

    Geospatial exposure mapping

    Linking asset locations to hazard maps, using spatial statistics and geostatistics. Asset locations are often imprecise. See Model and measurement gaps.

  3. 03

    Damage functions

    Relating hazard intensity to damage. Functions are uncertain and vary by region and asset type.

  4. 04

    Supply-chain analysis

    Tracing indirect exposure through suppliers and infrastructure. Supply-chain data are incomplete.

13Methods

How it is studied, and what the methods cannot say.

  1. Climate and atmospheric scienceHazard projections for portfolios · Tail and compound hazards · Scenario physical variablesApplied here
  2. Spatial statistics and geostatisticsGeolocating exposures · Aggregating location risk · Resolution sensitivityApplied here
  3. Financial economics and macro-financeCredit risk transmission · Market pricing studies · Cross-sector transmissionApplied here
  4. Scenario design and stress testingTranslating NGFS scenarios · Short-term climate scenarios · Dynamic balance sheetsApplied here
14Questions

Questions and answers.

What is the difference between acute and chronic physical risk?
Acute risk comes from events such as floods, storms and wildfires; chronic risk comes from gradual shifts such as rising temperatures, sea level rise and changing rainfall.
Why do physical risk scores disagree?
Providers use different hazard models, climate scenarios, spatial resolutions and vulnerability assumptions. Disagreement signals uncertainty that should be shown to decision makers.
How does physical risk affect a mortgage?
Damage and rising insurance costs can reduce property value and borrower income, increasing the chance of default and the loss if default occurs.
Why are indirect effects important?
Because firms depend on suppliers, customers and infrastructure; disruption anywhere in that network can cause losses even without direct damage.
Does the platform map individual firms' assets?
No. It publishes methods and sector examples. It does not assess any firm's assets or exposure.
Can historical losses guide future risk?
Only partly. Climate change, growing exposure and changing vulnerability mean the past is an incomplete guide.
Climate and Nature Financial Risk

Bring your expertise to this field.

The current service level is R0: information and enquiries. An enquiry receives a reference and names the next step; applications, payments, compute allocations and registrations open only when their team, terms and review capacity exist.

Skip to toolbar